Tag: cheating

  • Three myths about cheating 

    Three myths about cheating 

    “8 ways to keep a man,” “How to keep a marriage” – training and seminars on such topics are often based on the idea of ​​control in relationships. Many people believe that it is in our power to control the “quality of relations” and that it depends primarily on us whether the partner will cheat. In our opinion, this belief is based on three myths. More precisely, these are not entirely myths, sometimes they turn out to be true, but they become a problem when we consider each betrayal through their prism. The human experience is much more diverse than our ideas about it. 

    Myth # 1: “Cheating appears due to relationship problems.” 

    And really, can there be a place for cheating in a happy marriage? And does not the fact of betraying automatically mean an unsuccessful marriage? Sometimes not. Often the cheating partner is not going to destroy the relationship; moreover, his partner, maybe children and the family nest, in general, are dear to him. In our culture, it is very difficult to accept the idea that adultery also happens in marriages in which there are no serious problems. Like the man saw a young pretty woman on the https://primedating.com/gallery.html  site, they met and something terrible happened. In fact, there are no relationships at all without problems. Take a closer look at the relationship, which only yesterday seemed strong, but today cracked, and there will certainly be some explanation. 

    And although cheating is what a person seems to be doing in relation to his partner this act is far from being always about a partner. Sometimes this is the way out of a very deep personality conflict. Since childhood, each of us has a dilemma every now and then – to choose the security of maternal embrace or risky exploration of the world. 

    Different parts of our “I” cannot simultaneously receive satisfaction in marriage – at least not automatically. It hurts to accept, but this is the reality of life. Some are trying to solve this dilemma in polygamous relationships, but such a compromise has many pitfalls. And by the way, keep in mind: “I am polygamous, but my wife does not know” – this is not an open marriage. As soon as cheating gets revealed, a personal conflict instantly turns into an interpersonal one, and then the question “what is wrong between us” comes to the fore. Although until the moment of finding a random text or someone else’s stuff in the spouse’s car, this was an internal conflict of one person, in fact, very indirectly related to the partner. 

    This myth follows the second, which can become destructive for the one who is cheated on. 

    Myth # 2: “We cheat because we lack something in the partner.”  

    The bitter truth is that a person sometimes enters into a relationship on the side, unconsciously rebelling against what he values ​​most in his partner. Imagine a woman who has a wonderful husband, two children, this friendly family experienced a lot of good and difficult things together. This woman insanely appreciates the care and attention of a partner. And at the same time, his courtesy and well-organized daily life suppress her. A woman falls in love with a man who has no permanent job and acts quite windy. Each of our friends, lovers reflects something special in us. Sometimes we did not suspect. 

    She, of course, feels enormous guilt, but at the same time, an incredible rise: this romance helped her to feel that she was alive again! She discovered something new in herself; she never thought she was capable of it. But at the same time, she really really appreciates her marriage. He is incredibly important to her. It’s just that a certain part of her “I” could not fully express itself in these stable relations.  

    Myth # 3: “Male and female infidelities are different in essence” 

    Men cheat easily and for the sake of drive, and women only when they feel an emotional connection, the social stereotype tells us. In fact, both men and women have emotional and sexual needs. But society, as we know, looks rather condescendingly on how a man satisfies both of them – having a reliable rear in the form of a family and sexual adventures on the side. But the woman is required to sacrifice her sexual interests for the sake of the family. 

    In fact, the role of a caring mother, which is most often chosen by a woman, turns out to be a real anti-aphrodisiac in partnerships. Responsibility for others prevents her from focusing on her desires. To reconcile the emotional connection with home reliability and comfort is not a problem to be solved, it is a paradox that needs to be dealt with somehow. And how exactly – in the form of refusal or restriction of one’s desires, polygamous relationships, open marriage – everyone already decides for himself. And no one can solve it for another. 

     

  • Renault denies report of emissions cheating software

    Renault denies report of emissions cheating software

    Renault is denying a report that its vehicles are equipped with software that allowed its vehicles to cheat on emissions testing.

    The statement Wednesday from the French carmaker followed a report in the newspaper Liberation, which claimed to have obtained an investigative document from the Economy Ministry indicating that emissions from two models – the Renault Captur and the Clio IV – spewed emissions more than 300 percent higher than the legal limit in real-life conditions.
    The ministry’s fraud department handed its findings to prosecutors in November.

    French authorities raided Renault premises after Volkswagen was found to have used software to cheat on U.S. diesel emissions tests. Renault recalled 15,000 cars last year over excessive levels of harmful gases, but the company insisted there was no intentional wrongdoing.

  • Fiat Chrysler, Cummins reject diesel cheating suit

    Fiat Chrysler, Cummins reject diesel cheating suit

    Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV and Cummins Inc said on Monday they will fight a class-action lawsuit filed against the companies accusing them of cheating on diesel emissions tests.

    On Monday, lawyers representing owners of older 2500 and 3500 Dodge Ram trucks filed a class-action lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Detroit, asserting the companies “conspired to knowingly deceive consumers and regulators of illegally high levels of diesel emissions in their vehicles.”

    The suit accuses the automakers of fraud, violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act and consumer-protection laws by intentionally misleading the public, concealing emissions levels and illegally selling noncompliant polluting vehicles.

    The suit filed by Seattle lawyer Steve Berman said the emissions catalysts are not durable and do not meet emission standards, and that at times emissions are nearly 10 times legal limits.

    The class action suit comes as Fiat Chrysler and Cummins are fighting over the costs of an emissions recall involving a different, newer population of trucks.

    Fiat Chrysler said in a statement it “does not believe that the claims brought against it are meritorious” and the company “will contest this lawsuit vigorously.”

    Cummins spokesman Jon Mills said the lawsuit “has no merit. We are obviously disappointed in the effort to tarnish our image and we plan to vigorously defend ourselves.”

    The suit covers owners of 2007–2012 Dodge Ram 2500 and 2007–2012 Dodge Ram 3500 pickup trucks.

    Reuters reported on Oct. 10 that Fiat Chrysler and Cummins Inc have been fighting over the $200 million estimated cost for a recall of 130,000 newer 2500 Ram pickup trucks equipped with Cummins diesel engines that could exceed U.S. pollution limits.

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and California Air Resources Board have demanded a recall of 2013-2015 model year Ram 2500 pickup trucks with 6.7L Cummins diesel engines because moisture can lead to the deactivation of the selective catalyst reduction system, causing excess nitrogen oxide emissions, Cummins said.

    Fiat Chrysler has sued Cummins to recover the $60 million it has spent to date repairing 42,000 trucks at its own expense, a company lawyer said in court documents. Settlement talks are ongoing.

    Cummins counter-sued, saying Fiat Chrysler would not cooperate in the recall “for one reason – money” and said the automaker was “holding both Cummins and its own customers hostage.”

    When the emissions system fails, the warning light goes on and if the vehicle isn’t fixed soon the vehicles go into “limp mode” that allow them to only be driven very slowly.

  • Japan’s Mitsubishi Motors to resume sales after latest cheating scandal

    Japan’s Mitsubishi Motors to resume sales after latest cheating scandal

    Japanese automaker Mitsubishi Motors Corp (7211.T) will resume domestic sales of eight vehicle models on Oct. 1, the company said on Friday, after correcting overstated mileage readings in its second cheating scandal this year.

    Japan’s sixth largest automaker has admitted it falsified the mileage on 12 models, including the Pajero and Outlander SUV, taking a blow to its reputation.

    The latest suspension came after a two-month suspension in sales of four minivehicle models this year, including two produced for Nissan Motor Co. (7201.T), following the initial admission of incorrect fuel economy readings.

    The market value of the company has tumbled since that scandal broke, prompting it to seek financial assistance from Nissan, which agreed to buy a controlling one-third stake for $2.2 billion.

    Japan is Mitsubishi’s fifth-largest market, following markets including Asia ex-Japan, Europe and other regions. Its home country comprised roughly 10 percent of its vehicle sales during 2015/16.