Tag: Counterfeit Goods

  • HK customs seized counterfeit cosmetics

    HK customs seized counterfeit cosmetics

    Hong Kong Customs has seized more than 1300 items of suspected counterfeit cosmetics after raids on three sites this week. In an anti-counterfeiting operation conducted with the assistance of the trademark owners, customs officers took enforcement action at four dispensaries, five medicine stores and a warehouse. The raids took place in Tsim Sha Tsui, Mong Kok and Sheung Shui.

    The suspected counterfeit cosmetics and skin care products have an estimated market value of about $73,000 and included soothing gel, eyebrow pencils and face powder.

    Eight men and five women were arrested, including seven shop owners and six salespersons, aged from 19 to 60. They have all been released on bail as investigations continue.

    In a statement, Hong Kong Customs said it has been carrying out stringent enforcement against the sale of infringing goods and will continue to step up patrols and enforcement actions against infringing activities during the Christmas season.

    “Customs reminds consumers to procure goods at reputable shops and to check with the trademark owners or their authorised agents if the authenticity of a product is in doubt.”

    Retailers were warned to be cautious and prudent in merchandising since the sale of counterfeit goods is a serious crime and offenders are liable to criminal liability.

    Under the Trade Descriptions Ordinance, any person who sells or possesses for sale any goods with a forged trademark commits an offence. The maximum penalty upon conviction is a fine of $500,000 and imprisonment for five years.

  • Snapdeal unveils ‘Brand Shield’ to help firms fight counterfeits

    Snapdeal unveils ‘Brand Shield’ to help firms fight counterfeits

    India’s e-commerce major Snapdeal Monday said it has launched ‘Brand Shield’, an anti-counterfeiting programme to help brands report counterfeit products being sold on its platform. The programme has been designed based on the inputs received from various brand owners, Snapdeal said in a statement.

    The programme is aimed at enabling a structured interaction between the platform and brands with regard to any intellectual property (IP) issues flagged by the brand, it added.

    Under Brand Shield, there will be an online, triple-check point process for brands to report any violation of their IP rights in terms of trademark, copyright, patent or concerns related to design.

    Brands can also list specific issues relating to unlawful copying of logos, brand images, design features and packaging by sellers listed on Snapdeal’s platform. Brands will be required to establish their ownership of the IP, identify the listing of concern through proof and state their claim of infringement.

    The statement said designated teams at Snapdeal will review every report of IP infringement submitted through Brand Shield. Upon verification of the accuracy and adequacy of the information provided by the brand, Snapdeal will take down the listing within one business day, it added.

    In continuation of current practice, Snapdeal will also continue to de-list products/ listings in compliance with any directions or orders passed by the courts and other relevant authorities, the statement said.

    “The issue of unscrupulous sellers misusing online marketplaces to sell fake goods is a global problem. Brand Shield is part of our ongoing initiatives to collaborate with brands owners to combat counterfeits and infringement offences,” a Snapdeal spokesperson said.

    Snapdeal, an online marketplace, acts as an intermediary connecting buyers and independent third party sellers. It also prohibits the sale of counterfeit products on its marketplace and any sellers found in violation are penalised as per the terms of agreements with the sellers, the statement said.

  • Police seized counterfeit goods at Sim Lim Square

    Police seized counterfeit goods at Sim Lim Square

    Singaporean police have found $1.03 million worth of fake goods at Sim Lim Square.

    The counterfeit products were seized from four retail outlets in the high-profile shopping centre.

    Some 6000 pieces of trademark-infringing items including laptop power adaptors, batteries, LCD screens, power supply units, cables and earpieces were seized in the raid and three men were arrested.

    According to Criminal Investigation Department, selling or distributing goods with falsely applied trademarks can attract fines of up to $100,000, and jail terms of up to five years.

    “Police take a serious view of intellectual property right (IPR) infringements and will not hesitate to take action against perpetrators who show blatant disregard for our IPR laws and at the expense of legitimate businesses,” said Florence Chua, director and deputy commissioner of police (investigations and intelligence).

  • Alibaba seeks tougher penalties for counterfeit goods

    Alibaba seeks tougher penalties for counterfeit goods

    Alibaba Group has called for tougher laws, stricter enforcement and stiffer penalties to crack down on purveyors of counterfeit goods in China.

    At a press conference at its headquarters in Hangzhou, Alibaba said China’s “ambiguous counterfeiting laws” were hampering authorities’ ability to build legal cases against counterfeiters, resulting in a low conviction rate that is “the fundamental reason for the inefficiency in combating counterfeiting and protecting intellectual property”.

    “Current regulations are no longer able to cope with the need to fight counterfeiting,” according to the company’s public appeal, which is published in full below. “Criminals can escape any legal consequence, leaving law enforcement agents and consumers feeling helpless, and society bearing the damage.” The company urged authorities to strengthen laws, boost enforcement and impose more punitive penalties to deter counterfeiters.

    Alibaba has long faced criticism over the sale of counterfeits by independent vendors in its giant e-commerce marketplaces, which host some 1.5 billion product listings at any given time.

    “Alibaba Group is itself a victim of counterfeiting,” the note says. “The manufacturing industry and business environment of China suffers even more. Counterfeiting is damaging, not only to consumers and legitimate merchants, but also to innovation and the long-term economic development of our nation, hindering China’s growth as a responsible economic power.”

    To maintain the trust of consumers and legitimate merchants selling on its platforms, the company has been waging an escalating war to control the problem, employing a range of tactics to combat fakes and put counterfeiters out of business. Alibaba screens and monitors product listings using manpower and advanced search, image-recognition and big-data technology. The company also works with authorities in China to track down the source of counterfeits and prosecute offenders. Recently, Alibaba has also used China’s courts to cause pain for fake-goods sellers.

    Alibaba officials stressed the company remains firmly committed to continuing its anti-counterfeiting battle, but its ability to remove merchants and products from its marketplaces will be much less-productive in the long run without the support of more legally enforceable sanctions.

    The full Alibaba Group statement is below:

    In the ongoing war against counterfeiting, society is currently faced with an impasse. In Alibaba Group’s view, progress against this illegal activity is negligible because the costs and risks of producing and selling counterfeits are too low. The only way out of this is to impose tougher criminal sanctions on every individual involved in the chain of operation. Only by doing this, can China’s manufacturing industry return to the path of originality and innovation that ultimately leads to sustainable development.

    In 2016, our Platform Governance Department identified and handled 4495 leads related to counterfeiting. Each involved a value of goods exceeding the statutory minimum of RMB 50,000 for criminal investigation. Of these, law-enforcement departments followed up 1184 leads, which led to just 33 convictions, according to public information, representing a conviction rate of only 0.7 per cent.

    Alibaba came up with the 4495 leads via proactive big-data screening by its Platform Governance team, brand owners’ reports, consumer complaints and random checks. But law-enforcement agencies often found it difficult to classify and quantify incidences of counterfeiting and also had difficulties building legal cases due to ambiguous counterfeiting laws. As a result, public security agents were only able to build 469 cases from 1184 leads.

    The extremely low conviction rate is the fundamental reason for the inefficiency in combating counterfeiting and protecting intellectual property. Current regulations are no longer able to cope with the need to fight counterfeiting. Criminals can escape any legal consequence, leaving law-enforcement agencies and consumers feeling helpless and society bearing the damage.

    Alibaba established its own 2000-member-strong anti-counterfeiting force and has invested over RMB 1 billion each year to proactively combat counterfeiting with the most advanced technology and data models. For the 12 months ended August 2016, Alibaba took down 380 million product listings and shut down 180,000 Taobao stores and 675 operators as a result of its anti-counterfeiting action. As a private enterprise, Alibaba has no law-enforcement power. We can only uncover irregularities, take down the product listings, report the cases to the regulators and wait for law enforcement to handle the cases.

    We do our best to stop counterfeit goods from landing on our platform but cannot entirely stop them from proliferating offline and moving to other platforms. We identify and handle irregularities according to the highest standard of platform-management rules, but cannot impose penalties on the criminals.

    Alibaba Group is itself a victim of counterfeiting. The manufacturing industry and business environment of China suffers even more. Counterfeiting is damaging, not only to consumers and legitimate merchants, but also to innovation and the long-term economic development of our nation, hindering China’s growth as a responsible economic power.

    We therefore call for further development of our laws and regulations, stricter law enforcement and harsher punishments to strengthen the efforts to combat counterfeiting. Counterfeiters are our arch-enemy and we will stop at nothing to fight them.

    The criminalisation of drunk driving once delivered a clear message to society that violators will have to face serious consequences for their actions. Such a message served as a deterrent. We hope our society can reach a consensus to collectively increase the resources and efforts towards combating counterfeiting to no lesser extent than was done with drunk driving. To stamp out counterfeiting in China, all of us should play our part.

    Enlightenment-era criminologist Cesare Beccaria once said, “crimes are more effectually prevented by the certainty of punishment.”

    There is no way to root out counterfeiting with a conviction rate of 0.7 per cent. Only through stricter law enforcement and appropriate punitive measures can we stop criminals from evading responsibility for their actions. Only when counterfeiters get the punishment they deserve will the interests of consumers be properly protected.

  • Thailand targets counterfeit branded goods

    Thailand targets counterfeit branded goods

    Thailand is clamping down on counterfeit branded goods with plans for a campaign to target tourists.

    The Thai Commerce Ministry is seeking the support of foreign embassies as it launches its “Stop Fake Goods” campaign, aimed at travellers.

    Meantime, the government says it will stringently inspect traders for counterfeit goods, including examining their tax-payment history.

    New Year visitors to Thailand will be urged not to buy fake goods, says director-general Thosapone Dansuputra of the ministry’s Intellectual Property Department. He says the aim is to ensure Thailand moves away from its bad reputation for trading in fakes.

    He says it is illegal for visitors to buy counterfeit products, and the government will set up billboards in tourist spots to warn shoppers and traders not to buy or sell fakes. Both in Thai and English – and Chinese is some areas – the billboards will be posted at airports, BTS and MRT stations.

    Also, Commerce Ministry officers in each province will be on watch for any trading of counterfeit products.
    The department will also join forces with copyright owners, police and the Internal Security Operations Command to inspect areas known for selling fake goods, such as flea markets.

    Thosapone said that to boost the penalties for trading in counterfeit goods, the department is co-operating with the Revenue Department to investigate the tax history of suspected violators.

  • Boom in teenage arrests for selling counterfeit goods online

    Boom in teenage arrests for selling counterfeit goods online

    Hong Kong Customs officials report they have arrested a record number of teenagers for selling counterfeit goods online via social media.

    According to a report in the South China Morning Post, officials have arrested double the number of teenagers in the first 11 months of 2015 as in the entire previous year.

    The majority of the arrested – 54 secondary school pupils and 28 university students – were allegedly selling fake goods on social media, with Facebook an especially popular channel.

    Last year, just 41 arrested were made, according to Louise Ho, head of the intellectual property investigation bureau of the Hong Kong Customs and Excise Department.

    The 82 arrests accounted for nearly 40 per cent of all the counterfeit arrests made by customs this year.

    Ho says students seem unaware of their legal responsibilities and the criminal nature of selling counterfeit goods online, and see the trade as easy money.

    They appear unaware it is insufficient defence legally to disclose the goods are counterfeit.

  • Paipai.com axed to fight counterfeiting

    Paipai.com axed to fight counterfeiting

    China’s number 2 eCommerce player JD.com has axed its consumer to consumer online storePaipai.com in a bid, it says, to cut sales of counterfeit goods.

    The store will be closed by December 31 and after a transitional period of three months, the company will completely close down the website of Paipai.com.

    “The shutdown of the C2C platform is in line with the company’s policy to combat the marketing and sale of counterfeit products and the company will make persistent efforts to protect the interests of consumers and brands,” JD.com said in a statement.

    Paipai.com, along with another site Wanggou, were acquired from WeChat parent Tencent in March 2014. The combined businesses have a goodwill and intangible asset value of US$400 million, making it a very expensive gesture in the war against counterfeit goods in Mainland China.

    The company says it has yet to calculate the book value of the loss given the two websites are accounted for in the books as a combined entity and Wanggou will continue to operate.

    While JD.com is amputating a limb, Alibaba is undergoing a high profile battle in the US courts with French luxury brand owner Kering which alleges Alibaba has failed to take sufficient steps to counter the trading of counterfeit goods on its various websites, as reported by Inside Retail Asia last week.