Tag: policies

  • Australian Beef Exports Surge Amid Us-china Trade Tensions: A Shift In Global Market Dynamics

    Australian Beef Exports Surge Amid Us-china Trade Tensions: A Shift In Global Market Dynamics

    The Australian beef industry has recently experienced a surge in exports to China, taking market share formerly held by the US. This shift has transpired in the wake of US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House and the ensuing trade tensions between the US and China. The shift of trade from the US to Australia has channelled hundreds of millions of dollars that were once funneled into the US cattle industry into Australian coffers.

    A Shift in Beef Trade

    US beef exports to China, which were valued at approximately A$182 million per month, experienced a significant decline when permits at several American meat facilities were allowed to expire by Beijing in March. This situation was further exacerbated by the trade war initiated by Trump. Other agricultural exports from the US to China have also taken a hit since Trump resumed power. The most notable among these is soybeans, with US farmers missing out on billions of dollars’ worth of exports in the current harvest season.

    In addition to these factors, US beef exports have generally been on a downward trend in recent years due to drought conditions shrinking the national cattle herd, leading to reduced production and record high prices. However, the slump in trade with China has been both more sudden and severe.

    According to Chinese trade data, the value of US beef exports to China dropped dramatically to just $12 million in July and $14 million in August, compared to $179 million and $189 million during the same period a year earlier.

    Australia’s Beef Boom

    Simultaneously, Australia has seen a surge in its beef exports to China. These shipments have soared from $212 million a month in the two years leading up to March to $335 million in July and $342 million in August. From April through August, US beef exports to China were valued at $587 million less than if trade had remained at the average levels from the previous two years. During this same period, Australian shipments were worth $474 million more.

    While Brazil, China’s largest beef supplier, has also increased its exports in recent months, Australia has reaped the most benefits due to its grain-fed beef, which most closely resembles US products.

    Matt Dalgleish, a meat and livestock analyst at Australian consultancy firm Episode 3, noted that this shift has been beneficial for Australia, helping to drive up cattle prices.

    The Future of Beef Trade

    Despite these changes, there is potential for US beef exports to rebound. Trade negotiations between Beijing and Washington could potentially end the current impasse, according to Joe Schuele, a spokesperson for the US Meat Export Federation.

    Even in the case of a trade agreement being reached, it could still take several years for the US to regain its former market share, according to Dalgleish. This is due in part to Australia’s beef production reaching an all-time high and its meat being significantly cheaper than that of the US.

    Adding another layer of complexity to the situation is an ongoing investigation by Beijing into beef imports, which could potentially result in trade restrictions to address a surplus of beef in China. The outcome of this investigation is expected to be released by November 26.

    Questions & Answers

    What caused the shift in beef exports from the US to Australia?
    This shift can be attributed to a combination of expired permits for American meat facilities, initiated trade war by President Donald Trump, and drought conditions in the US which led to reduced beef production.

    How has this shift impacted Australia’s economy?
    This shift has resulted in a boom for the Australian beef industry, driving up cattle prices and channeling hundreds of millions of dollars into the Australian economy.

    What could potentially alter the current state of beef trade?
    Potential changes in the beef trade could be prompted by the ongoing Beijing investigation into beef imports and the outcome of ongoing trade negotiations between the US and China.

  • Indonesian markets panic over Trump’s policies

    Indonesian markets panic over Trump’s policies

    Panic hit domestic financial markets on Friday as investors showed concern over the anticipated policies of US president-elect Donald Trump that may negatively affect Indonesia’s economy.

    The Jakarta Composite Index (JCI) — the benchmark of the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) — ended in the red on Friday after falling 4 percent to 5,231.97 points, its lowest level in the past two months.

    Almost all sectors ended in negative territory, as investors sold a net of Rp 2.46 trillion (US$184.27 million) worth of securities throughout the trading day.

    Net sales jumped more than eightfold from the previous day, when investors ditched less than Rp 300 billion worth of securities.

    The situation was just as bad in the foreign exchange (forex) market, with the rupiah sinking as low as Rp 13,865 per US dollar, the lowest point since June 24. Market intervention by Bank Indonesia (BI) propped up the currency, enabling it to end at Rp 13,383 to the greenback.

    Friday’s development sent the government, financial authorities and analysts rushing to calm panicked investors.

    They attributed the market rout to speculation that Trump might push up fiscal spending after taking office.

    Higher spending may translate into higher inflation and interest rates in the US, which is not good news for Indonesia and other emerging markets that rely heavily on foreign funds, as some of those funds would return to the US.

    “Up to this day, the developments of the rupiah, the JCI and securities are greatly affected by regional and global sentiment impacted by the US political situation,” Finance Minister Sri Mulyani Indrawati said Friday.

    “It is natural to see that every decision made in the US, as the world’s largest economy, even in the form of a statement, can have a significant impact.”

    She said investors, including those holding government debt papers (SUN), did not have to be worried, as Indonesia had a low debt risk with a relatively long maturity profile and a relatively small state budget deficit.

    Moreover, with various fiscal measures to control the state budget deficit, spending and tax revenues, government debt papers had a very low risk profile.

    “There is no need to be trapped in groundless fear,” she stated.

    The IDX and the Financial Services Authority (OJK) also tried to calm investors, saying any impact of Trump’s policies would be temporary.

    BI senior deputy governor Mirza Adityaswara admitted the central bank had intervened in local forex and sovereign bond markets to stabilize the rupiah.

    Selling by forex traders, particularly in non-deliverable forward (NDF) derivative contracts, he went on, had triggered the market volatility.

    NDF contracts, unlike forex forwards, are settled in dollars determined by reference to a daily fixing, which in some jurisdictions is set by a survey of lenders.

    “The NDF market weakened and affected traders without considering Indonesia’s economic fundamentals. That’s why the rupiah was traded at Rp 13,400 [per US dollar] during opening, because the market followed what occurred in Mexico, Brazil and other places,” he said.

    Mirza emphasized that the country’s fundamentals remained strong, with economic growth of 5.02 percent in the third quarter, higher than in most of Indonesia’s Southeast Asian peers.

    Meanwhile, stock market analysts deemed investors’ reaction exaggerated and urged a more cautious manner. They said the market should actually have priced in the expectation of a December rate increase in the US, with further increases in 2017 and 2018.

    Separately, Trade Minister Enggartiasto Lukita said investors should wait until Trump formed his team. He expressed optimism that economic relations between the two countries would remain positive, despite Trump’s seemingly protectionist stance.

    “But we also need to keep our market strong. With a population of 250 million people, we have enough bargaining power,” he said.

    We’ll push local industries here, so that money circulation will happen much more domestically,” he added.