Tag: settlement

  • 3 Southeast Asian Central Banks Partner on Cross-Border Digital Money Initiative

    3 Southeast Asian Central Banks Partner on Cross-Border Digital Money Initiative

    Central banks in Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand have formed a cross-border digital money partnership to standardise commercial acceptance and settlement across the three jurisdictions.

    The Monetary Authority of Singapore led the rollout of the initiative, operating under the name BLOOM, which stands for Borderless, Liquid, Open, Online, Multi-currency.

    Announced last Friday, the central banks of Malaysia and Thailand entered the programme as official policymaker participants alongside Singapore’s monetary authority. Commercial banks, merchant payment networks and financial technology providers across all 3 markets will work directly with the regulators to establish standard operating practices for multi-currency transactions.

    Setting Terms for Regional Digital Settlement

    Work under the framework focuses on defining how distinct forms of digital money can clear, settle and exchange without institutional friction across borders. Participating teams will address three concrete tracks: cross-border acceptance and settlement mechanisms, technical interoperability between domestic payment systems, and programmable transaction controls.

    Implications for Cross-Border Merchants

    For cross-border retailers and online marketplace platforms operating across the Singapore-Malaysia-Thailand corridor, disparate clearing mechanisms create structural working capital delays. Wholesale clearing channels often demand days to convert and settle local balances.

    By establishing common protocols for programmable and digital currencies, central banks are testing ways to bypass fragmented correspondent banking relationships. The operational risk sits in technical compliance, where commercial operators must adapt their checkout infrastructure to central bank specifications while managing distinct domestic regulatory requirements across each border.

    The Trajectory of Southeast Asian Payments

    The BLOOM framework builds on existing cross-border links established across the region over recent years. While those early retail integrations connected consumer smartphone apps for tourist spending, they relied on conventional commercial bank rails behind the scenes.

    BLOOM shifts the focus from consumer front-ends to the core settlement layer, evaluating programmable digital tokens to automate settlement conditions directly. The test phase will determine operational guidelines, with the participating regulators due to outline technical specifications and initial private-sector pilot results in upcoming joint releases.

  • Grab, Vinasun to negotiate $1.8 million compensation dispute

    Grab, Vinasun to negotiate $1.8 million compensation dispute

    Top taxi firm Vinasun and ride hailing firm Grab have told the court that they’ll negotiate a compensation dispute. The People’s Court of Ho Chi Minh City on Friday approved the litigants’ wish to ‘sit together,’ and temporarily suspended the trial. The suspension of trial is for no longer than a month, and the reopening date will be announced later, the court said.

    “The lawsuit has dragged on for over a year, but the claimant was not able to prove the damage, as well as the causal relationship with Grab’s influence. The defendant is also very worn out wasting time defending a wrong it did not commit,” said Luu Tien Dung, Grab’s lawyer.

    “This is one of the reasons why both sides have decided to negotiate,” he added.

    Vinasun filed the suit against Grab in June last year, accusing the Malaysia-based firm of abusing the Ministry of Transport’s pilot scheme and committing violations.

    It said Grab’s illegal activities were responsible for nearly VND42 billion (nearly $1.8 million) of the VND76 billion ($3.25 million) in losses that it suffered in 2016 and the first half of 2017.

    The trial began last February, but was adjourned a month later to allow for more evidence to be gathered. Grab protested the valuation of Vinasun’s losses.

    Last October, prosecutors asked the court to accept Vinasun’s petition for compensation of nearly VND42 billion (nearly $1.8 million) in one payment, dismissing Grab’s claim that it was a tech firm and not a taxi company.

    Grab responded by sending a letter to Prime Minister Nguyen Xuan Phuc, saying that identifying Grab as a taxi firm would be “a step backwards from Industry 4.0.”

    Under the latest draft of a decree prepared by the Transport Ministry, transport firms offering services with under 9-seater cars should be registered as taxi firms before they can apply ride-hailing technologies.

    This means that Grab and other ride-hailing firms would have to register their services again as taxi businesses and comply with corresponding legal responsibilities regarding their operating licenses, drivers’ profiles and tax duties.