Tag: Surfstitch

  • SurfStitch creditors approve the EziBuy deal

    SurfStitch creditors approve the EziBuy deal

    SurfStitch creditors have approved a proposal from EziBuy to take over the embattled surfwear company and either relist or sell it in the next three years, bringing the online retailer’s drawn-out administration to a close on Wednesday.

    Nearly two-thirds of creditors voted in favour of the deed of company arrangement (DOCA) proposed by EziBuy’s parent company, Alceon Group, over a competing offer from SurfStitch non-executive director Abigail Cheadle, which had the support of SurfStitch co-founder Lex Pedersen and general manager Justin Hillberg, as well as several “major shareholders”, according to Cheadle, but not the administrators or other board members.

    Pedersen said the outcome reflected the emotions of the participants, rather than what was in the best interest of stakeholders.

    “Unfortunately I think the process and outcome was a little more emotional than financial. Personalities, long-standing conflicts and conveniences may have tangled the outcome that should have exclusively been what’s best for the true stakeholders, that is the shareholders and staff,” he told.

    The administrators in March recommended creditors approve the EziBuy DOCA, saying it offered a better return to all stakeholders. Cheadle last week sent a revised proposal to shareholders, matching many of the terms of the EziBuy offer and addressing some of the administrators’ concerns about the process of issuing shares.

    However, the administrators on Tuesday reiterated their support for the EziBuy deal and said creditors would need to issue a new appointment of proxy to vote for the second Cheadle DOCA.

    Cheadle lodged another enhanced proposal an hour before the meeting on Wednesday and moved to postpone the vote to allow creditors whose votes were deemed invalid to participate in the decision and enable an independent expert to assess the EziBuy offer.

    Under the EziBuy DOCA, ordinary creditors and employees will be paid in full within six to eight weeks and class action creditors will receive an initial cash dividend between $3.4 million to $4.3 million. Class action creditors and current shareholders will also be issued convertible notes, converting to shares in the newly merged company, which has an obligation to seek an IPO or other liquidity event within the next three years.

    Cheadle has questioned the valuation of the convertible note, since it implies a valuation well over ten times what Alceon paid for EziBuy ($10 million) last year. But creditors proved reluctant to adjourn the meeting after learning that EziBuy would rescind its offer if the vote was postponed.

    Voters were also keen to end the company’s voluntary administration, which has hampered SurfStitch since it has been on cash terms with suppliers since August.

    Cheadle expressed disappointment after the meeting and maintained that her proposal would have delivered a better outcome for everyone involved.

    “I am extremely disappointed the proposal for SurfStitch was not successful. Since August last year, the proposal has been basically the same. During that time I have worked on the offer on a full-time basis, as well as personally funding it, because I believed strongly in the company’s future,” she said.

    “I hope SurfStitch does well under its new ownership.”

    Pedersen said EziBuy will need to step up to revitalise the business, which he believes still has the potential to succeed.

    “I remain of the view that this business should never have been placed into voluntary administration. Alas, it is where it is today despite the process, so what happens from here is now of utmost importance.

    “EziBuy now need to step up with the support that Justin Hillberg and the team need and deserve as they push to restore it to pre-administration performance. The headwinds created by this protracted process are brisk, but the people [who] have built this business and the customers that support it are resilient.”

  • Surfstitch casts aside another brand

    Surfstitch casts aside another brand

    The administrators of Surfstitch Group and Surfstitch Holdings have announced the sale of wholly owned UK subsidiary, Surfdome Shop Limited to Internet Fusion Limited.

    Internet Fusion has paid cash and has an obligation to pay deferred consideration for the acquisition. The total consideration (including the deferred consideration) for the acquisition amounts to c.GBP £7m.

    John Park, Quentin Olde and Joseph Hansell of FTI Consulting said the companies had agreed terms and entered into an exclusive process with Internet Fusion in relation to the Surfdome transaction before they were appointed administrators.

    Surfdome is a board sports online retailer based in the UK and services consumers across Europe.

    Internet Fusion is a UK based sports and adventure retailer, servicing a number of markets with specialist websites via its proprietary e-commerce platform.

    “The sale of Surfdome to a synergistic buyer, Internet Fusion, is a good outcome for the ongoing growth of the Surfdome business and continues with the execution of the restructuring plan for the group to sell down non-core assets to focus on the profitable and successful SurfStitch Australian business,” said Olde.

    Surfstitch’s operating subsidiaries continue to trade while the holding company is in administration.

  • Proposal made to restructure Surfstitch

    Proposal made to restructure Surfstitch

    A party previously involved with Surfstitch has submitted a draft bid to restructure the company, which would see it re-list on the ASX, pending support from a creditor vote in coming months.

    Administrators FTI Consulting, appointed last week, notified creditors of the proposal at a meeting in Sydney on Tuesday morning, but FTI senior MD John Park declined to say what the response was, other than that the meeting was “quick” and “calm”.

    Park would not confirm whether major shareholder and co-founder Justin Cameron was behind the proposal, but said Cameron did not attend the creditor meeting.

    “I’ve received one draft deed of company proposal this morning,” Park said. “It’s a proposal to see…a relisting of the vehicle.”

    Creditors include management, advisors and the shareholders associated with the Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and Gadens shareholder class actions, as well as Crown Financial’s Kim Sundell, who also has pending legal action against the company.

    FTI expects to receive more restructure proposals for the company over the next 30-50 days before its due to deliver its report and recommendation to creditors about the future of the business.

    Liquidation is still a possibility, although not something that Park believes will deliver an optimal outcome for stakeholders.

    “My experience is that creditors look upon a deed of company arrangement a lot more favourably than a liquidation scenario,” he said.

    “[Litigators will] be looking for a palatable commercial outcome.”

    The administration was undertaken to put a stay on the legal proceedings. Park said a restructure would be the only outcome that would generate a return for shareholders.

    “[Litigaton funders] have indicated that they are receptive to looking at some form of restructuring proposal which takes into account their interests and they will assess it on its merits and make a decision,” Park told journalists on Tuesday afternoon.

    Park could not quantify what the company owed to creditors, citing the inability to determine the value of the pending legal action.

    Quinn Emanuel filed a $100 million class action on behalf of shareholders against SurfStitch in May and was in the process of negotiating a settlement with the company when it entered voluntary administration two weeks ago.

    Quinn Emanuel partner Damian Scattini has previously declined to say what size settlement would be acceptable to shareholders, at the time citing ongoing negotiations.

    Meanwhile, Gadens did not place a specific value on the claim it filed in June, other than to say it would be a “large” claim.

    “It’s a bit pointless to pluck figures out of the air. It all depends on how loss is to be calculated. What’s more, we don’t know the full spread of members of the class in order to make that calculation,” Gadens’ Melbourne-based partner, Glenn McGowan, QC, told IR last week.

    McGowan said he has not been contacted by administrators, except for a standard form letter to prove the claimed debt.

    “I imagine they have spoken to the [litigation] funders. But they [the administrators] will have to speak to the lawyers in each proceeding if any agreement is to be reached,” he told IR on Tuesday.

    However, he has previously said he is pessimistic about shareholders’ chances of recouping losses from Surfstitch. That is why Gadens in June also filed a class action against Cameron, who, like many CEOs, holds an insurance policy.

    Surfstitch’s operating subsidiaries continue to trade while the holding company is in administration, Park said there was initial concern from suppliers but that they’d been “pleased” with internal stakeholder response so far.

  • Struggling Surfstitch slips into administration

    Struggling Surfstitch slips into administration

    Struggling surfwear chain, Surfstitch Group, has today entered administration after appointing John Park, Quentin Olde and Joseph Hansell of FTI Consulting effective immediately.

    The retailer’s online companies, SurfStitch (Aus), SurfDome (UK) and Swell (US), and publishing businesses MagicSeaweed (UK) and Stab (Aus & US) will continue to trade while the administration process takes place.

    Sam Weiss, chairman of Surfstitch, said that the companies “reluctantly made the appointments due to several significant external challenges including two Class Actions, protracted litigation and an ASIC investigation which have brought high levels of uncertainty impacting the companies’ trading position.”

    “The administrators have been appointed with the intention of preserving value for stakeholders in the business whilst recapitalisation options are pursued.”

    John Park, leader Australia, corporate finance & restructuring of FTI Consulting, said the administrators will work closely with the operating businesses to preserve value for stakeholders.

  • Surfstitch chairman survives shareholder’s removal attempt

    Surfstitch chairman survives shareholder’s removal attempt

    Sam Weiss, chairman of struggling surfwear retailer, Surfstitch, has survived a shareholder’s attempt to remove him from the post.

    Crown Financial, which has a more than a five per cent stake in Surfstitch, had sent the company a notice of requisition to hold the shareholder meeting, after taking legal action against Surfstitch related to a fallout over a content sharing deal, and wanted Weiss removed as a director of Surfstitch.

    The board backed Weiss and earlier urged shareholders to vote against the proposal, which the majority did, with 91.78 per cent of the votes cast in favour of keeping the chairman.

    Surfstich says it is exploring the option of selling media assets and other asset sales as it faces litigation from Crown Financial group, separate class actions in the Queensland and NSW supreme courts and a continuing ASIC investigation – all of which are expected to impact its cash position.

    “I have been involved in the retail trade for the past forty years and have experience in it in Europe, the United States and Asia and have been actively engaged in e-commerce virtually since the beginning of it nearly twenty years ago,” Weiss said prior to the vote.

    “I was under no illusions about the degree of difficulty of the task ahead, nor was I when I commenced my appointment with the company.”

    Surfstitch went into a trading halt in late May after shareholders launched a potential $100 million class action.

    The action launched by law firm Quinn Emanuel in Queensland’s Supreme Court accuses Surfstitch of making misleading statements and forecasts of its 2015/16 earnings.

    The company last traded at 6.8 cents a share, significantly lower than its peak of $1.90 a share in December 2015, and is expected to resume trade when it reports its full-year results in August.

  • Surfstitch sets sights on USD788m prize

    Surfstitch sets sights on USD788m prize

    Online surf and action sports retailer Surfstitch is on track to deliver its first profit in three years and is eyeing the sales and market share of bricks and mortar and online rivals as part of a five-year plan to lift sales fivefold to AUD1 billion (USD788.2 million).

    Surfstitch reaffirmed its full-year prospectus forecasts on Wednesday after record pre-Christmas trading and recent acquisitions fuelled a 23 percent surge in December-half sales and boosted gross margins by 236 points to 46.9 percent.

    Pro-forma earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation jumped 160 percent to AUD3 million and net profit excluding one-off costs came in at AUD300,000, compared with a loss of AUD1.4 million in the same period in 2014.