Tag: tesla

  • Tesla Investors To Focus On Demand Issues In Earnings Report

    Tesla Investors To Focus On Demand Issues In Earnings Report

    Tesla’s quarterly report on Wednesday will likely show whether the Elon Musk-led electric-vehicle maker is facing any weakness in demand that is starting to weigh on the wider auto industry.

    Decades-high inflation, rising energy bills in Europe and signs of a weakening China market have raised doubts among some analysts about whether Tesla can buck an economic slowdown and continue to raise prices without hurting its sales.

    Although Musk has said Tesla “does not have a demand problem”, the company’s latest report on deliveries showed that it made 22,000 more EVs than it delivered to customers in the third quarter. It blamed the rise in inventory on transportation-related problems.

    Demand for Tesla vehicles in China, the world’s biggest market for autos, is emerging as a major worry among Wall Street analysts, given that the EV maker faces tough competition from domestic rivals BYD, Nio Inc and XPeng Inc.

    “A top concern right now is demand in China as wait times seem to be shrinking,” RBC Capital Markets said. “Question is if this is a blip or signs of a bigger change among consumers.”

    Globally, there are fears that auto sales may lose steam in the coming quarters as rising interest rates and a weaker economic backdrop discourage consumers from making big-ticket purchases.

    Analysts say pricing is a key factor that could help Tesla make up for a possible demand drop and boost revenue.

    The average U.S. selling price of Tesla’s Model 3 has risen about 24% since January last year, potentially helping the EV maker rake in record revenue in the third quarter.

    Wells Fargo said Tesla is likely the biggest beneficiary of the Biden administration’s new consumer tax credits to incentivize North American battery and EV production.

    Musk also raised hopes of a share buyback earlier this month when he said “Noted” on Twitter in response to a major individual investor’s call for a stock buyback.

    Such a move could benefit Musk, whose 15% stake in Tesla makes him its biggest stakeholder, and help him raise cash to fund his $44 billion deal to take Twitter Inc private.

    Some experts say Musk may need to sell up to an extra $3 billion in stock after the earnings announcement to help fund the deal.

    “If there is a big sale of Tesla stock by Musk after earnings, that will be a strong sign that the Twitter deal is on the cusp of closing,” said Adam Badawi, a law professor at UC Berkeley.

  • Tesla Achieves New Sales Milestone In China For September 2022

    Tesla Achieves New Sales Milestone In China For September 2022

    Tesla sold 83,135 China-made vehicles wholesale in September 2022, smashing its record of monthly sales in China, the China Passenger Car Association reported. The number marks an 8 per cent increase from August 2022 and outpaced more than the 5 per cent month-over-month growth of all wholesale electric vehicle sales in China, according to CPCA data. It set a record for Tesla’s Shanghai factory since production began in December 2019, and topped the prior sales record of 78,906 in June, as the U.S. carmaker continues to invest in China production.

    Globally, Tesla, last week said it delivered 343,830 electric vehicles in the third quarter, a record for the world’s most valuable automaker, but less than the 359,162 analysts on average had expected, according to Refinitiv. Tesla quickened its China deliveries after suspending most production at the Shanghai plant in July for an upgrade, which aimed to bring the factory’s weekly output to around 22,000 units compared with levels of around 17,000 in June, Reuters previously reported.

    The plant, which manufactures Model 3s and Model Ys, reopened on April 19, 2022, after a COVID lockdown, but only resumed full production in mid-June. Production accelerated despite heatwaves and COVID curbs that hit its suppliers in the southwest region of the country.

    China’s BYD continued to lead the domestic EV market with 200,973 wholesale sales in September, a nearly 15 per cent jump from August, as CPCA said higher oil prices and government subsidies continue to encourage more consumers to choose electric vehicles.

  • Tesla’s Logistical Challenges Overshadow Record Deliveries

    Tesla’s Logistical Challenges Overshadow Record Deliveries

    Tesla Inc on Sunday announced lower-than-expected  electric vehicle deliveries in the third quarter, as logistical challenges overshadowed its record deliveries.

    The top electric car maker said “it is becoming increasingly challenging to secure vehicle transportation capacity and at a reasonable cost,” but some analysts were also concerned about demand for high-ticket items due to the weakening global economy.

    “The economy around the edges is still hurting Tesla that’s mostly logistical. But that I think there is some demand (issues) sprinkled in there,” Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives said after the delivery results.

    “There is a dark cloud over the auto sector. And Tesla is not immune.”

    Ford Motor said last month inflation-related costs would be $1 billion more than expected in the third quarter and that parts shortages had delayed deliveries.

    Apple Inc. is backing off plans to increase production of its new iPhones this year after an anticipated surge in demand failed to materialize, Bloomberg reported last month, citing people familiar with the matter.

    “I think that EVs are in for probably a little bit of a rough patch, just because people are probably going to be a little bit hesitant and less urgent to buy something new,” OANDA senior market analyst Ed Moya said.

    Tesla delivered 343,830 electric vehicles, a record for the world’s most valuable automaker, but less than the 359,162 analysts on average had expected, according to Refinitiv. A year earlier Tesla delivered 241,300 units.

    The latest deliveries fell short of Tesla’s production of 365,923 vehicles, which is rare for the automaker which has seen its deliveries higher or similar to production in many of recent quarters.

    “As our production volumes continue to grow, it is becoming increasingly challenging to secure vehicle transportation capacity and at a reasonable cost during these peak logistics weeks,” Tesla said in a statement on Sunday.

    Tesla CEO Elon Musk said on Sunday “Smoothing out crazy end of quarter delivery wave to reduce expedite costs & relieve stress on Tesla team.”

    Last year,  he said Tesla is having a “crazy wave” of deliveries at the end of each quarter, because its Shanghai factory makes cars for exports to Europe and other countries in the first half of a quarter and then cars to be sold in China.

    Tesla again asked employees to help deliver “a very high volume of vehicles to eagerly waiting customers during the final days of Q3” in California, according to an email seen by Reuters.

    Tesla on Sunday said it has “began transitioning to a more even regional mix of vehicle builds each week, which led to an increase in cars in transit at the end of the quarter.”

    Tesla set an ambitious target to produce almost 495,000 Model Y and Model 3s in the fourth quarter of this year, internal plans reviewed by Reuters show.

    The company’s production ambitions come against the backdrop of increasingly gloomy outlook for global growth, with Musk himself telling top managers in June he had a “super bad feeling” about the economy and planned to cut staff.

    During a conference call in July, Musk said at first that macroeconomic uncertainty might have some impact on demand for its electric vehicles, but when pressed for details by an analyst, he said the company did not have a demand problem but a production problem.

    The automaker expanded production capacity in Shanghai after a resurgence in COVID-19 cases forced a suspension at the plant and fueled the first dip in deliveries after a nearly two-year-long record run.

    In September, Tesla’s vehicle order backlog fell, especially in China, Troy Teslike, a Tesla data tracker tweeted.

    Tesla said it delivered 325,158 Model 3 compact cars and Model Y sport-utility vehicle, as well as 18,672 of its Model S and Model X premium vehicles to customers during the quarter.       Meanwhile, Musk on Friday showed off a prototype of its humanoid robot ‘Optimus,’ predicting the electric vehicle maker would be able to produce millions and sell them for under $20,000 – less than a third of the price of a Model Y.

    Experts were impressed by the speed of development of Tesla’s humanoid robots, but they agreed with Musk, who said “there’s still a lot of work to be done to refine Optimus and prove it.”

  • Tesla Weighs Reset For China Retail Strategy Even As Sales Boom

    Tesla Weighs Reset For China Retail Strategy Even As Sales Boom

    Tesla is reevaluating the way it sells electric cars in China, its second-largest market, and considering closing some showrooms in flashy malls in cities like Beijing where traffic plunged during COVID restrictions, two people with knowledge of the plans said.

    The shift would put more emphasis on stores in less-costly suburban locations that can also provide repairs as the company works to meet Elon Musk’s goal of improving service for existing customers, many of whom have complained of long delays, they said.

    As part of that push, Tesla is looking to ramp up hiring of technicians and other staff for service jobs in China, one of the people said. Tesla’s China recruitment website showed more than 300 openings for service jobs as of Thursday.

    Musk said last week on Twitter, in response to a Tesla owner in Texas who complained that he had been waiting a month to get his vehicle fixed, that he had made “advancing Tesla service to make it awesome” a top priority.

    Unlike mainstream automakers, Tesla owns all of its own stores, rather than relying on dealers. It also sells its cars online. That has allowed it more leeway to adjust a retail strategy that had been initially modeled on Apple’s stores.

    Tesla didn’t immediately response to a request for comment.

    The U.S. automaker sold 400,000 China-made Model 3 and Model Y cars in the first eight months of the year, with 60% of them sold locally, according to the China Passenger Car Association. That was 67% more than a year ago.

    The change in Tesla’s approach in China, where it has become the second-largest EV brand behind BYD , would reflect a recognition that it has to build customer loyalty now that it has established its brand in the world’s largest car market, one analyst said.

    “It’s not necessary to open showrooms in expensive shopping malls, especially when the repair business has become lucrative,” said Yale Zhang, managing director at Shanghai-based consultancy Automotive Foresight.

    “It makes better sense to keep only one or two showrooms downtown to keep the brand positioning but move more to suburbs.”

    Tesla opened its first store in central Beijing in 2013 and now has over 200 outlets across the country that display models and arrange test drives for potential buyers.

    More than half of the stores, however, do not offer maintenance service since they are in high-rent locations where space is limited. That includes Tesla’s first store in Beijing and its first store in Shanghai.

    More than half of Tesla’s showrooms in seven of China’s biggest cities, including Shenzhen and Chengdu, are now in downtown areas, according to a Reuters count based on Tesla’s China website.

    Like other companies, Tesla has seen traffic in its stores heavily disrupted by China’s tough approach to containing COVID-19, which has involved lockdowns of varying scope and duration, including in Shanghai where it has a factory.

    Reuters could not determine how many urban showrooms Tesla was considering closing, how many new locations in fast-growing suburbs could be opened or what the cost of that shift would be.

    The carmaker has been the target of a series of customer complaints and lawsuits in China, including a well-known case last year which saw an unhappy owner clamber atop a Tesla at the Shanghai auto show to protest the company’s handling of her complaints about malfunctioning brakes.

    The incident received significant attention in China and prompted state media outlets to criticise the company.

    Tesla later apologised to Chinese consumers for not addressing the complaints in a timely manner and pledged to review its service operations.

    Tesla’s EV rivals in China have taken a mixed approach to retail distribution. Apart from self-run stores, BYD and Xpeng also rely on third-party dealers.

    Nio, like Tesla, has a network of high profile urban stores in China. It has also invested in door-to-door service, dispatching workers, many of whom were hired from the hotel industry, to pick up cars for repairs and drop them off when work is complete.

  • Elon Musk Faces Skeptics As Tesla Gets Ready To Unveil ‘Optimus’ Robot

    Elon Musk Faces Skeptics As Tesla Gets Ready To Unveil ‘Optimus’ Robot

    Tesla Chief Executive Elon Musk blamed overreliance on factory robots for sending the electric carmaker to “production hell” four years ago, saying humans were better at certain jobs.

    My, how times have changed.

    Musk’s Texas company now is floating ambitious plans to deploy thousands of humanoid robots, known as Tesla Bot or Optimus, within its factories, expanding eventually to millions around the world, according to job postings. Buzz is building within the company as Tesla is having more internal meetings on robots, a person familiar with the matter said.

    Longer term, Musk said at a TED Talk robots could be used in homes, making dinner, mowing the lawn and caring for the elderly people, and even becoming a “buddy” or a “catgirl” sex partner.

    The robot business eventually may be worth more than Tesla’s car revenue, according to Musk, who is now touting a vision for the company that goes well beyond making self-driving electric vehicles.

    At its “AI Day” on Sept. 30, Tesla will unveil a prototype from its project Optimus, an allusion to the powerful and benevolent leader of the Autobots in the Transformers series. Production could start next year, Musk said.

    Tesla faces skepticism that it can show technological advances that would justify the expense of “general purpose” robots in factories, homes and elsewhere, according to robotics experts, investors and analysts interviewed by Reuters.

    Tesla already employs hundreds of robots designed for specific jobs for production of its cars.

    Humanoid robots have been in development for decades by Honda Motor Co and Hyundai Motor Co’s Boston Dynamics unit. Like self-driving cars, the robots have trouble with unpredictable situations.

    “Self-driving cars weren’t really proved to be as easy as anyone thought. And it’s the same way with humanoid robots to some extent,” the lead of NASA’s Dexterous Robotics Team, Shaun Azimi said.

    “If something unexpected happens, being flexible and robust to those kinds of changes is very difficult.”

    At an “Autonomy” event in 2019, Musk promised 1 million robotaxis by 2020 but has yet to deliver such a car.

    Musk’s robots may be able to demonstrate basic capabilities at the event, but it would be hard for them to impress public expectations of robots that are as capable as humans, experts say.

    To succeed, Tesla will need to show robots doing multiple, unscripted actions, said Nancy Cooke, a professor in human systems engineering at Arizona State University. Such proof could boost Tesla stock, which is down 25% from its 2021 peak.

    “If he just gets the robot to walk around, or he gets the robots to dance, that’s already been done. That’s not that impressive,” she said.

    Tesla did not respond to Reuters’ request for comments, but Musk in the past proved skeptics wrong, jump-starting the electric car market and building a rocket company, SpaceX, although some product launches were behind schedule.

    Initially, Optimus will perform boring or dangerous jobs, including moving parts around its factories, according to Musk.

    Musk acknowledged that humanoid robots do not have enough intelligence to navigate the real world without being explicitly instructed.

    But he said Tesla can leverage its expertise in AI and key components to develop and produce smart, yet less expensive, humanoid robots at scale.

    He tweeted on Monday that its Autopilot team is also working on its Optimus robot, when asked about fixes of what it calls Full Self-Driving beta – a test version of its new automated driving software.

    Tesla is on hiring spree for people to work on humanoid bi-pedal robots, with about 20 job postings on “Tesla Bot” including jobs for designing key robot parts like “actuators”.

    “The code you will write will at term run in millions of humanoid robots across the world, and will therefore be held to high quality standards,” one of the job postings said.

    Tesla has over 2 million vehicles on the road.

    Jonathan Hurst, chief technology officer at Agility Robotics, a humanoid robot firm founded in 2015 said the technology “is right now starting to turn the corner.”

    “Certainly, an important measure of success is do they make money from it,” he told Reuters, referring to Tesla’s humanoid robot efforts.

    Analysts see more pageant than product. “It’s all part of distracting people and giving them the next shiny object to chase after,” Guidehouse Insights analyst Sam Abuelsamid said.

    “Investors are not excited about Optimus,” said Gene Munster, managing partner at venture capital firm Loup Ventures, which holds Tesla stocks. “It’s just such a low probability that it works at scale,” he said, saying it is “infinitely harder than self-driving cars.”

    And then there is Musk’s own experience with robots in the factory.

    During the 2018 production hell, Musk specifically noted the problems of the “fluff bot,” an assembly robot that failed to perform simple tasks that human hands can do – picking up pieces of “fluff” and placing them on batteries.

    He said the cost of having technicians maintain the complicated robot far exceeded that of hiring someone to do the assembly.

    The fluff bot is “a funny example but drives home the point that autonomy often doesn’t generalize well, and so handling soft fluffy material that isn’t as predictable as a rigid part was causing a huge problem,” Aaron Johnson, a mechanical engineering professor at Carnegie Mellon University, said.

    “Human hands are way better at doing that,” Musk said.

  • Tesla Weighs Reset For China Retail Strategy Even As Sales Boom

    Tesla Weighs Reset For China Retail Strategy Even As Sales Boom

    Tesla is reevaluating the way it sells electric cars in China, its second-largest market, and considering closing some showrooms in flashy malls in cities like Beijing where traffic plunged during COVID restrictions, two people with knowledge of the plans said.

    The shift would put more emphasis on stores in less-costly suburban locations that can also provide repairs as the company works to meet Elon Musk’s goal of improving service for existing customers, many of whom have complained of long delays, they said.

    As part of that push, Tesla is looking to ramp up hiring of technicians and other staff for service jobs in China, one of the people said. Tesla’s China recruitment website showed more than 300 openings for service jobs as of Thursday.

    Musk said last week on Twitter, in response to a Tesla owner in Texas who complained that he had been waiting a month to get his vehicle fixed, that he had made “advancing Tesla service to make it awesome” a top priority.

    Unlike mainstream automakers, Tesla owns all of its own stores, rather than relying on dealers. It also sells its cars online. That has allowed it more leeway to adjust a retail strategy that had been initially modeled on Apple’s stores.

    Tesla didn’t immediately response to a request for comment.

    The U.S. automaker sold 400,000 China-made Model 3 and Model Y cars in the first eight months of the year, with 60% of them sold locally, according to the China Passenger Car Association. That was 67% more than a year ago.

    The change in Tesla’s approach in China, where it has become the second-largest EV brand behind BYD , would reflect a recognition that it has to build customer loyalty now that it has established its brand in the world’s largest car market, one analyst said.

    “It’s not necessary to open showrooms in expensive shopping malls, especially when the repair business has become lucrative,” said Yale Zhang, managing director at Shanghai-based consultancy Automotive Foresight.

    “It makes better sense to keep only one or two showrooms downtown to keep the brand positioning but move more to suburbs.”

    Tesla opened its first store in central Beijing in 2013 and now has over 200 outlets across the country that display models and arrange test drives for potential buyers.

    More than half of the stores, however, do not offer maintenance service since they are in high-rent locations where space is limited. That includes Tesla’s first store in Beijing and its first store in Shanghai.

    More than half of Tesla’s showrooms in seven of China’s biggest cities, including Shenzhen and Chengdu, are now in downtown areas, according to a Reuters count based on Tesla’s China website.

    Like other companies, Tesla has seen traffic in its stores heavily disrupted by China’s tough approach to containing COVID-19, which has involved lockdowns of varying scope and duration, including in Shanghai where it has a factory.

    Reuters could not determine how many urban showrooms Tesla was considering closing, how many new locations in fast-growing suburbs could be opened or what the cost of that shift would be.

    The carmaker has been the target of a series of customer complaints and lawsuits in China, including a well-known case last year which saw an unhappy owner clamber atop a Tesla at the Shanghai auto show to protest the company’s handling of her complaints about malfunctioning brakes.

    The incident received significant attention in China and prompted state media outlets to criticise the company.

    Tesla later apologised to Chinese consumers for not addressing the complaints in a timely manner and pledged to review its service operations.

    Tesla’s EV rivals in China have taken a mixed approach to retail distribution. Apart from self-run stores, BYD and Xpeng also rely on third-party dealers.

    Nio, like Tesla, has a network of high profile urban stores in China. It has also invested in door-to-door service, dispatching workers, many of whom were hired from the hotel industry, to pick up cars for repairs and drop them off when work is complete.

  • Inside Tesla’s Drive To Keep Musk’s Battery Promise

    Inside Tesla’s Drive To Keep Musk’s Battery Promise

    The secret behind Elon Musk’s goal of selling 20 million Tesla’s a year by 2030 lies in its pioneering battery technology.

    The good news is that by using bigger cells and a new process to dry-coat electrodes, Tesla could halve the cost of a Model Y battery, saving more than 8% of the car’s U.S. starting price, battery experts with ties to the company said.

    The bad news is that it’s only halfway there, according to 12 experts close to Tesla or familiar with its new technology.

    That’s because the dry-coating technique used to produce the bigger cells in Tesla’s 4680 battery is so new and unproven the company is having trouble scaling up manufacturing to the point where the big cost savings kick in, the experts told Reuters.

    “They just aren’t ready for mass production,” said one of the experts close to Tesla.

    Still, the gains Tesla has already made in cutting battery production costs in the past two years could help boost profits and extend its lead over most electric vehicle (EV) rivals.

    Musk’s promised improvements in battery cost and performance are seen by investors as critical to Tesla’s quest to usher in an era where it can sell a $25,000 EV for a profit – and stand a better chance of hitting its 2030 targets.

    Battery systems are the most expensive single element in most EVs, so making lower-cost, high-performance packs is key to producing affordable electric cars that can go toe to toe with combustion-engine rivals on sticker prices.

    Tesla is one of only a handful of major automakers that produce their own EV batteries and by manufacturing Model Y cells at U.S. plants, the SUV will remain eligible for U.S. tax credits when many rival EVs may no longer qualify.

    Among the 12 battery experts Reuters spoke with, nine have close ties to Tesla and three of the nine have examined Tesla’s new and old battery technology inside and out through teardowns.

    Tesla did not respond to requests for comment.

    ‘HE WILL SOLVE IT’

    The sources predict that Tesla will find it difficult to fully implement the new dry-coating manufacturing process before the end of this year, and perhaps not until 2023.

    Stan Whittingham, a co-inventor of lithium-ion batteries and a 2019 Nobel laureate, believes Tesla Chief Executive Elon Musk has been overly optimistic on the time frame for commercializing the new technique.

    “I think he will solve it, but it won’t be as quick as he likes. It’s going to take some time to really test it,” he said.

    In August, Musk told shareholders Tesla would be producing high volumes of 4680 batteries by the end of 2022.

    According to the experts, Tesla has only been able to cut the Model Y’s battery cost by between $2,000 and $3,000 so far, about half the savings Tesla had planned for the 4680 battery, which it unveiled two years ago.

    But those savings have come mainly from the design of the new 4680 cells, which are bigger than those in Tesla’s current 2170 battery, they said.

    But the heart of the drive to push down costs is the dry-coating technology, which Musk has described as revolutionary but difficult to execute.

    According to the sources, it should deliver as much as half of the $5,500 cost savings Tesla hopes to achieve, by slashing manufacturing costs and one-time capital spending.

    Tesla acquired the know-how in 2019 when it paid over $200 million for Maxwell Technologies, a company in San Diego making ultracapacitors, which store energy for devices that need quick bursts of electricity, such as camera flashes.

    Building on Maxwell’s technology, Tesla began making 4680 dry cells this year, first in a pilot near its Fremont, California plant and more recently at its new global headquarters in Austin, Texas.

    ‘BEST IN CLASS’

    The technology allows Tesla to ditch the older, more complex and costly wet-coating process. It’s expensive because it needs a substantial amount of electricity, machinery, factory space, time, and a large labour force.

    To coat electrodes in the wet process, battery producers mix the materials with toxic binder solvents. Once coated, the electrodes are dried in massive ovens, with the toxic solvents that evaporate in the process being recovered, treated and recycled – all adding to the cost.

    With the new technology, electrodes are coated using different binders with little use of liquids, so they don’t need to be dried. That means it’s cheaper, faster and also less environmentally damaging.

    Because of its simplicity, the process allows Tesla to cut capital spending by a third and slash both the footprint of a factory and its energy consumption to a 10th of what would be needed for the wet process, Tesla has said.

    But the company has had trouble commercializing the process, the sources said.

    Maxwell developed its dry-coat process for ultracapacitors, but the challenge with coating electrodes for EV batteries is that they are much larger and thicker, which makes it hard to coat them with consistent quality at mass-production speeds.

    “They can produce in small volume, but when they started big volume production, Tesla ended up with many rejects, too many,” one of the sources with ties to Tesla told Reuters.

    Production yields were so low that all the anticipated cost savings from the new process were lost, the source said.

    If all the potential efficiencies from dry-coating and the bigger cells are realised, the manufacturing cost for the Model Y’s 4680 battery pack should fall to $5,000 to $5,500 – roughly half the cost of the 2170 pack, according to the sources.

    The rising cost of battery materials and energy pose a risk to those forecasts, however, and Tesla has not yet been able to significantly improve the new battery’s energy density or the amount of power it packs, as Musk has promised.

    Still, despite those factors, the savings Tesla is expected to achieve will end up making the 4680 battery the industry’s “best in class” for the foreseeable future, one source said.

    BULKING UP

    Much of the $2,000 to $3,000 cost savings achieved with the 4680 battery so far has come from other improvements, and using bigger cells has proven particularly potent, the experts said.

    The 4680 cells are 5.5 times the size of the 2170 cells by volume. The older cylindrical cells measure 21mm in diameter and 70mm in height, hence the name. The 4680 cells have a 46mm diameter and are 80mm high.

    With the older technology, Tesla needs about 4,400 cells to power the Model Y and there are 17,600 points that need to be welded – four per cell – to create a pack that can be integrated into the car, the sources said.

    The 4680 battery pack only needs 830 cells and Tesla has changed the design so that there are only two weld points per cell, slashing the welding to 1,660 points and leading to significant cost savings.

    The simpler design also means there are fewer connectors and other components, which has allowed Tesla to save further on labour costs and machine time.

    Another source of efficiency has been the larger cell’s far sturdier outer case. Tesla can now bond the cells together with adhesive into a rigid honeycomb-like pack which is then connected directly to the inner body structure of the Model Y.

    This eliminates the intermediate step of bundling cells into larger modules which are then installed in a traditional battery pack, the sources said.

    By shifting to this “cell to vehicle” design, Tesla can reduce the weight of a traditional 1,200-pound battery pack by 55 pounds or more – saving about $500 to $600 per pack, one of the sources said.

    But mastering the dry-coating technique remains the holy grail.

    “Bulking up the battery cell helped a lot in boosting efficiency, but pushing for 50% cost savings for the cell as a whole is another matter,” one source said.

    “That will depend on whether Tesla can deploy the dry-coating process successfully in a factory.”

  • Tesla Considering Lithium Refinery In Texas, Seeks Tax Relief

    Tesla Considering Lithium Refinery In Texas, Seeks Tax Relief

    Tesla Inc is considering setting up a lithium refinery on the gulf coast of Texas, as it looks to secure supply of the key component used in batteries amid surging demand for electric vehicles.

    The potential battery-grade lithium hydroxide refining facility, which Tesla touted as the first of its kind in North America, will process “raw ore material into a usable state for battery production”, the company said in an application filed with the Texas Comptroller’s Office.

    A decision to invest in Texas will also be based on the ability to obtain relief on local property taxes, Tesla said.

    Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk has previously said that Tesla may have to enter the mining and refining industry directly at scale as lithium prices surge.

    Musk has also been vocal about the need for more players in the lithium refining industry. “You can’t lose. It’s licensed to print money,” he had said at the company’s second-quarter earnings call.

    Securing a steady supply of battery components is seen critical for Tesla as it faces fierce competition in the fast-growing market for electric cars.

    If approved, construction could begin in the fourth quarter of 2022 and would reach commercial production by the end of 2024, Tesla said in the application dated Aug. 22.

    Under the plan, Tesla will ship the final product from the refinery by trucks and rail to various Tesla battery manufacturing sites supporting the supply chain for large-scale and electric vehicle batteries.

    Tesla, whose shares rose 1.4% in premarket trading, also said it would use less hazardous reagents and create usable byproducts, compared with the conventional process.

    Lithium prices have skyrocketed this year due to surging demand from the auto sector. China remains the world’s largest lithium processor, though proposed rival projects in the United States and European Union have faced a range of setbacks.

    If Tesla’s plan goes ahead, the carmaker could become the first in the sector to invest directly in lithium refining as automakers scramble to stitch up deals with miners and refiners.

    “Car-makers are trying to ensure they have control over the supply of lithium, hedging for any geopolitical situation that might arise in future where the supply is disrupted,” said Arpit Agarwal, director at venture capital firm Blume Ventures, which has backed EV startups such as Euler Motors and Yulu.

    Tesla also stands to gain from lower logistics costs as well as incentives it may get from the U.S. government, he added.

    Battery makers are also looking to increase production in the United States, where a shift toward EVs could increase as the country implements stricter regulation and tightens tax credit eligibility.

    Tesla itself signed a five-year supply deal with Australia’s Liontown Resources earlier this year, while rival EV makers Stellantis and Byd have invested in miners around the world.

    CATL, the world’s biggest battery maker, has also taken stakes in lithium miners.

  • Tesla Shares Close Lower After 3-1 Stock Split

    Tesla Shares Close Lower After 3-1 Stock Split

    Tesla’s shares closed 2% lower on Thursday as a three-for-one stock split announced by the world’s most valuable automaker to woo retail investors came into effect.

    The stock opened at $302 and closed at $296.07 as the split allowed investors to get two additional shares for each they owned as of Aug. 17. It had closed at $891.29 before the split on Wednesday.

    This is the second stock split by Tesla in as many years and follows similar moves by high-growth companies such as Amazon.com and Google-parent Alphabet to address the growing need to diversify investor base.

    Stock splits “certainly have a higher appeal to retail investors and makes their options more affordable as well,” said Art Hogan, chief market strategist at B. Riley.

    “Retail investors are a very important cohort for Tesla and today’s stock split is an acknowledgment of that fact.”

    Austin-based Tesla debuted in 2010 at $17 and in a decade surged to a peak price of $2,000, becoming one of the highest priced shares on Wall Street and making it difficult for small investors to bet on the high-growth stock.

    The company decided to split its stock on a five-for-one basis in August 2020 and breached $1 trillion in market capitalization in 2021.

    The EV maker is the sixth company in the S&P 500 index to split its shares this year, according to Howard Silverblatt, senior index analyst for S&P and Dow Jones indices.

    Tesla’s ticker was trending on social media stocktwits.com, indicating increased chatter among individual investors. The shares have lost about 11% of their value since March when the company announced plans to increase its number of shares.

    “In typical buy-the-rumor, sell-the-news style, investors tend to drastically scale back purchases of splitting stocks in the weeks ensuing the effective split date, causing price momentum to slow,” analysts at Vanda Research said in a note.

    A stock split does not affect the fundamentals of a company, but makes it easier for individual investors to do small trades. The benefits of such splits, however, are becoming less clear as brokerages let customers buy parts of a company’s share.

    Tesla’s shares have fallen about 16% so far this year amid a selloff in high-growth stocks due to worries over aggressive interest rate hikes and geopolitical uncertainties.

  • Tesla Braces For Earnings Hit, But EV Delivery Outlook Is Key

    Tesla Braces For Earnings Hit, But EV Delivery Outlook Is Key

    Tesla Inc’s second-quarter results on Wednesday are expected to show the strains of China’s COVID-19 lockdown and protracted startups of new factories. Investors want to know if the end of the year will be much better.

    Tesla has started layoffs, following through on a plan by Chief Executive Elon Musk, who said he had “a super bad feeling about the economy” in June. He also has said Tesla’s new factories in Austin, Texas, and Berlin are “gigantic money furnaces” which are losing billions of dollars.

    Add to that concerns about growing competition from electric vehicle makers and COVID-19 in Shanghai, home of Tesla’s China factory and its suppliers.

    “The expectations are very low for the quarter. The key to this is what they’re going to say going forward because expectations for the second half of this year are very strong for this company,” Curzio Research CEO Frank Curzio said.

    Analysts expect the electric vehicle market leader to report second-quarter revenue of $17.23 billion, an 8% decline from a record high achieved the previous quarter. Analysts also expect an adjusted profit of $1.86 per share, a 42% slump from a quarter ago, according to Refinitiv data.

    Musk in April said Tesla could raise deliveries 60% this year, which would translate into nearly 1.5 million vehicles, although Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives said many analysts expect closer to 1.4 million deliveries and will want to hear whether Musk is still bullish about demand amid recession fears.

    Tesla delivered 564,743 vehicles in the first half. It delivered 17.9% fewer EVs in the second quarter from the previous quarter as China’s COVID 19-related shutdown hit its factory and supply chain.

    Tesla navigated supply-chain challenges better than rivals early in the pandemic, and Deutsche Bank analyst Emmanuel Rosner said high prices and cost-cutting could help Tesla pleasantly surprise investors.

    The price of Tesla’s Model Y long-range version, now $65,990, has risen more than 30% since the start of 2021.

    The production outlook for the second half will depend much on the factory in Shanghai, which has just emerged from a two-month lockdown and is again scrambling to contain a resurgence of COVID-19.

    The competitive landscape is also heating up.

    Volkswagen AG’s CEO, Herbert Diess, sees a strong second half of 2022 and expects progress in catching up with Tesla due to easing chip shortages. Meanwhile, Musk tweeted in June that “Hyundai is doing pretty well,” referring to the South Korean automaker that has been gaining U.S. market share.

    Musk may also need to talk about issues beyond production and demand, including his effort to escape from a deal to buy Twitter Inc. Other issues include progress on Tesla’s plan to achieve full self-driving following the resignation of a high-profile executive, and progress on Tesla’s new batteries needed to boost production at its Texas factory.

    The value of Tesla’s bitcoin holdings has declined and will lead to impairment charges of hundreds of millions of dollars, according analysts’ estimates.

  • Tesla Worker Rejects $15 Million Payout In Race Bias Lawsuit

    Tesla Worker Rejects $15 Million Payout In Race Bias Lawsuit

    A Black former elevator operator at Tesla Inc’s flagship California assembly plant on Tuesday rejected a $15 million award in his lawsuit alleging racial abuse by coworkers, opening the door for a new trial after a judge slashed a $137 million jury verdict. Lawyers for Owen Diaz, who had sued Tesla in 2017, turned down the judge’s award in a brief filing in federal court in San Francisco.

    They said in a statement that the award was unjust and would not deter future misconduct by Tesla. “In rejecting the court’s excessive reduction by asking for a new trial, Mr. Diaz is again asking a jury of his peers to evaluate what Tesla did to him and to provide just compensation for the torrent of racist slurs that was directed at him,” his lawyers said.

    Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    U.S. District Judge William Orrick lowered the jury award, which was one of the largest of its kind in a discrimination lawsuit, to $15 million in April. He had also denied Tesla’s motion for a new trial, conditioned on Diaz’s acceptance of the lower award.

    Earlier this month the judge denied Diaz’s motion for permission to appeal that ruling and gave him two weeks to accept the lower award or agree to a new trial.

    Recently, Tesla shareholder filed a lawsuit accusing the company’s chief executive, Elon Musk, and board of directors of neglecting worker complaints and fostering a toxic workplace culture

    Tesla is facing a series of lawsuits involving alleged widespread race discrimination and sexual harassment at its Fremont, California factory, including one by a California civil rights agency.

    Last week, a Tesla shareholder filed a lawsuit accusing the company’s chief executive, Elon Musk, and board of directors of neglecting worker complaints and fostering a toxic workplace culture.

    Tesla has denied wrongdoing and says it has policies in place to prevent and address workplace misconduct.

    Diaz alleged that his colleagues and a supervisor subjected him to a hostile work environment that included slurs, caricatures and swastikas in his nine months working at the Fremont plant in 2015 and 2016.

    A jury had awarded Diaz $6.9 million of compensatory damages and $130 million of punitive damages last October, but Orrick in April said those numbers were excessive.

    Diaz’s lawyers in their statement on Tuesday said Orrick’s decision highlighted systemic bias that federal judges have against juries, which in turn violates the constitutional rights plaintiffs have to a trial by jury.

  • Tesla Sued By Former Employees Over ‘Mass Layoff’

    Tesla Sued By Former Employees Over ‘Mass Layoff’

    Former Tesla Inc employees have filed a lawsuit against the U.S. electric car company alleging its decision to carry out a “mass layoff” violated federal law as the company did not provide advance notice of the job cuts.

    The lawsuit was filed late Sunday in Texas by two workers who said they were terminated from Tesla’s gigafactory plant in Sparks, Nevada in June. According to the suit, more than 500 employees were terminated at the Nevada factory.

    The workers allege the company failed to adhere to federal laws on mass layoffs that require a 60-day notification period under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, according to the lawsuit.

    They are seeking class action status for all former Tesla employees throughout the United States who were laid off in May or June without advance notice.

    “Tesla has simply notified the employees that their terminations would be effective immediately,” the complaint said.

    Tesla, which has not commented on numbers of layoffs, did not immediately respond to requests for comment about the lawsuit.

    Musk, the world’s richest person, said earlier this month he had a “super bad feeling” about the economy and that Tesla needed to cut staff by about 10%.

    More than 20 people identifying themselves as Tesla employees said they were laid off, let go or had positions terminated this month, according to online postings and interviews with Reuters.

    The action filed by John Lynch and Daxton Hartsfield, who were fired on June 10 and June 15 respectively, seeks pay and benefits for the 60-day notification period.

    “It’s pretty shocking that Tesla would just blatantly violate federal labor law by laying off so many workers without providing the required notice,” Shannon Liss-Riordan, an attorney representing the workers told Reuters.

    She said Tesla is offering some employees only one week of severance, adding that she is preparing an emergency motion with a court to try to block Tesla from trying to get releases from employees in exchange for just one week of severance.

    The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas.

  • Tesla Sold 32,165 China-Made Vehicles In May

    Tesla Sold 32,165 China-Made Vehicles In May

    U.S. electric vehicle maker Tesla sold 32,165 China-made vehicles in May, including 22,340 for export, the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA) said on Thursday.

    That compares with 1,152 vehicles sold and none exported in April. The Tesla factory halted work for 22 days beginning late March to comply with a city-wide lockdown in Shanghai.

    The plant, which manufactures Model 3s and Model Ys, reopened on April 19 and resumed exports on May 11 but has struggled to get production back to pre-lockdown levels.

    Tesla’s Shanghai factory produced 33,544 vehicles in May, up 212% from April, the association added.

    China’s BYD delivered 114,183 cars in May. Electric vehicle maker Li Auto delivered 11,496 and Xpeng Inc 10,125.

    CPCA also said passenger car sales in May in China had totalled 1.37 million, down 17.3% from a year earlier.

    June sales should be 10% to 20% higher than a year earlier, CPCA secretary general Cui Dongshu told reporters. Demand from earlier months, suppressed by lockdowns that have now eased, would support June sales, Cui said.

    The world’s biggest auto market is recovering from its worst monthly drop since March 2020 after China’s efforts to stamp out COVID-19 outbreaks across multiple cities disrupted supply chains and dampened demand.

  • Tesla Leads In Driver-Assisted Technology Crashes

    Tesla Leads In Driver-Assisted Technology Crashes

    Tesla Inc reported 273 vehicle crashes since July involving advanced driving assistance systems, more than any other automaker, according to data U.S. auto safety regulators released on Wednesday.

    Automakers and tech companies reported more than 500 crashes since June 2021, when the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) issued an order requiring the information. Two U.S. Senators called for a deeper probe of the “out-of-control industry,” and a U.S. safety board said the data was not standardized so it was hard to evaluate performance of each carmaker’s system.

    Car companies are rushing to add driver assistance systems, saying these improve safety by handling some maneuvers. U.S. regulators are trying to understand the practical effect of the changes. But automakers collect and report data in different ways, making it difficult to evaluate systems performance.

    Democratic Senators Ed Markey and Richard Blumenthal told NHTSA in a letter that “publicizing the data alone is not enough. We urge NHTSA to … shed needed light on this out-of-control industry and impose guardrails to prevent more deadly crashes.”

    The current report contains “a ‘fruit bowl’ of data with a lot of caveats, making it difficult” to understand, National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Chair Jennifer Homendy said in a statement. “Tesla collects a huge amount of high-quality data, which may mean they’re overrepresented in NHTSA’s release.”

    Tesla’s advanced driver assistant software dubbed “Full Self Driving” has also created confusion about vehicle capabilities.

    The senators raised alarm about the high number of Tesla crashes. “We worry that some drivers today are using the technology as a convenience feature and are placing themselves and other road users in danger,” Markey and Blumenthal wrote.

    NHTSA ordered companies to quickly report all crashes involving advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and vehicles equipped with automated driving systems being tested on public roads.

    Of the 392 such crashes reported by a dozen automakers since July, six deaths were reported and five serious injuries. Honda Motor identified 90 crashes.

    Companies also reported 130 crashes involving prototype automated driving systems, while 108 involved no injuries and one was a serious injury crash.

    NHTSA said Alphabet Inc’s self-driving car unit Waymo reported 62 crashes involving automated driving systems, while General Motors’ Cruise had 23.

    Waymo said its crashes were not high severity and one-third were in manual mode. Airbags deployed in only two crashes.

    Cruise said it “has logged millions of miles in one of the most complex urban driving environments because saving lives is our chief aim.”

    The NTSB reiterated a five-year-old recommendation that NHTSA require automakers to provide standardized crash and usage data. It made the recommendation after the a 2016 crash killed a Tesla driver using the company’s Autopilot system, which the company website says “enables your car to steer, accelerate and brake automatically within its lane” but still requires the driver’s attention.

    NHTSA said the first batch of data has already been used to trigger investigations and recalls and helped inform existing defect probes.

    The data “will help our investigators quickly identify potential defect trends,” NHTSA Administrator Steven Cliff said, cautioning the raw number of incidents reported per manufacturer “is by itself inadequate to draw conclusions.”

    The agency emphasized crashes are tracked by individual automakers in different ways and discouraged comparisons in part because there are no comprehensive metrics on how widely each system is used.

    Tesla did not respond to requests for comment.

    Honda told Reuters it had found no defects in the systems and its crash reports were based on unverified customer statements “to comply with NHTSA’s 24-hour reporting deadline.”

    No other automaker reported more than 10 ADAS crashes during the period.

    Despite the limitations, NHTSA said the data was essential to quickly spot potential defects or safety trends. Incidents that occur when an advanced system was engaged within 30 seconds of a crash must be reported within 24 hours to NHTSA.

    The agency plans to release new data monthly.

    NHTSA has been scrutinizing Autopilot and said last week it was upgrading its probe into 830,000 Tesla vehicles with the system, a required step before it could seek a recall. The regulator had opened a preliminary evaluation to assess the performance of Autopilot after about a dozen crashes in which Tesla vehicles struck stopped emergency vehicles.

    Separately, NHTSA has opened 35 special crash investigations involving Tesla vehicles in which ADAS was suspected of being used. A total of 14 crash deaths have been reported in those Tesla investigations, including a May California crash that killed three people.

  • U.S. Agency Asks Tesla For Information On Canadian Fire Incident

    U.S. Agency Asks Tesla For Information On Canadian Fire Incident

    The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said on Thursday it has asked Tesla Inc for information about a recent 2021 Tesla Model Y fire in Vancouver, British Columbia, in which a driver reported struggling to exit.

    The NHTSA told Reuters the agency “is aware of the incident and has reached out to the manufacturer for information.”

    Electrek posted a video of the incident in which the owner said he received an error notification and then saw smoke. The driver said that to get out he “had to smash the window. … I kicked through the window because everything stops. The power didn’t work. The door didn’t open. The windows didn’t go down.”