Category: Research

Retail News Asia is committed to providing both local and global retailers with the latest Research throughout the Asian market. This on a daily base.

  • APAC robotics market set to reach $66b in 2017

    APAC robotics market set to reach $66b in 2017

    Asia-Pacific’s robotics – including drones – and related services market is estimated to reach $66 billion this year, according to IDC.

    IDC expects spending to accelerate over the five-year forecast period of 2017-2021, reaching $162 billion in 2021 with a CAGR of 25.2%. This represents more than a projected 70% of the world’s total robotics market.

    “The convergence of robotics and artificial intelligence technologies are accelerating the development of the next generation of intelligent robots for industrial, commercial, and consumer applications,” said Jing Bing Zhang, research director of robotics at IDC Manufacturing Insights.

    “Intelligent robots with innovative capabilities such as cognitive interaction, self-diagnosis, and learning are emerging and driving wider adoption of robotics in many industries including manufacturing, resources, healthcare, retail, and so on.”

    China dominates the Asia-Pacific robotics market, with spending on robotics and related services expected to reach $74 billion in 2021. This represents 45.7% of Asia Pacific’s total spending in the next five years.

    From a technology perspective, Asia-Pacific spending on robotic systems is expected to grow to $92 billion in 2021.This includes industrial, service and consumer robots and after-market robotic hardware.

    Meanwhile, services-related spending, which encompasses application management, education and training, hardware deployment, system integration, and consulting, will grow to over $44 billion in 2021.

    In the telecoms sector, operators in multiple markets are trialing using drone technology to improve network maintenance and fault detection capabilities. Vendors such as Nokia are meanwhile testing applications for drones including the instant establishment of LTE public safety networks.

  • They’re only human: Big data made simple

    They’re only human: Big data made simple

    Big data has become one of the big buzzwords of retail in 2017. But many retailers remain confused by what it means and how to use it.

    Cue a team from Scotland who just three years ago founded a startup called Big Data For Humans.

    They weren’t your typical team of ‘tech guys’ but by a group of highly experienced retailers with decades of shop floor customer experience under their belts. Their mission: harness the power of big data to bring an unprecedented depth of insight into customers – not just as lines on a spreadsheet but as groups of ‘humans’ with unique tastes, needs and spending habits.

    “It’s one of those ideas that didn’t come to us overnight. It came to us gradually,” recalls co-founder and CEO Peter Ellen. “I was a retailer for about 20 years as a founder, and latterly as CEO, of a retailer in the UK which grew pretty quickly throughout the 1990s. One of the key rationales there was that we were really customer focused – we knew which customers delivered the most sales and we analysed carefully how we could use those relationships to drive growth in the business.”

    In 2005 Ellen co-founded a business called Maxymiser, a cloud-based software solution that tests, targets and personalises what customers see on a web page or a mobile app, substantially increasing engagement and revenue. It was ultimately sold to Oracle in the US.

    “We dealt with digital marketers as well as general marketers. What became very clear was that very, very few of those digital marketers actually knew who their customers were and some couldn’t even tell you what a customer was. One of them said ‘Is that like a non-unique visitor?’ And I said, no that’s like a human,” Ellen recalls.

    “The dictionary definition of a customer is someone with whom you transact. The culture being created around digital marketing is such that people are starting to categorise anyone as a customer… Someone who rocks up to your digital store or anywhere else, rather than someone who actually buys something.”

    Lurkers vs spenders

    “When I was a retailer it was very important to differentiate between the people who hung around your store and the people who actually spent serious cash. Online, I think, that problem is magnified many, many times over. And with retailers facing increasing costs of acquisition online, under constant pressure of dealing with occupancy costs offline, and with all the other marketing costs they’re surrounded with in multichannel, it is economically critical that retailers build relationships with the customers they have. Those people deliver 80 per cent of your profits and if you leave that process to chance – or leave them to an email marketer to knock out a couple of emails here and there on a random basis – you’re probably missing out on the biggest profit and revenue opportunity your retail business has.”

    Ellen is constantly amazed how many retailers have no idea who their customers are. “They guess who their customers are or they use technology invented in a bygone era to do the job.”

    The problem identified, the solution was already there. Or was it? The technology required to measure and monitor customer behaviour meaningfully is very technical. Analysts use complex tools to understand it, then there is an uneasy transition to transfer that information in a usable format to the people running the marketing and managing actual stores.

    “We realised retailers fell into two groups: One was retailers who didn’t bother doing anything with their customer data because it seemed like too nasty or scary a project to attack because of the technical challenges and the cost. Then there was a second group who had invested vast sums of money into customer analytics and employed analytics teams but often the rate at which they were able to get the insights into the hands of people who actually wanted to do something with it was really slow.

    “And the cost associated with that process was really high. So it was almost easier for retailers to go on ignoring their customers and carry on acquiring them over and over many times with different methods and losing money in the process.

    “So we thought: that’s not right. It’s economically unsustainable. We watched some businesses growing and growing through omni channel where the costs got higher and higher the bigger they got. And their profit shrank as their sales grew. We thought: It’s time to do something about that. If we can simplify the process in a smart way, we could help a lot of retailers around the world.”

    That’s how Big Data for Humans thus became the first company in the market to develop an automated customer insights platform which has transformed the way retailers understand their customers and sell to them, helping deliver deeper understanding of customers, more effective marketing, increased customer value and thus higher revenue. At its heart is the ‘Customer Graph’, which empowers business users at all levels to use automated customer insights to power their marketing.

    “We realised that one of the best ways to understand people in the modern world is through networks and that’s how we understand our place in social [media] and professional networks as well. So why don’t we do something similar to understand customers in the retail business?”

    Overcoming barriers

    “We found there were barriers to achieving that goal. Most of them around the fact using graphs is a more complex and technically difficult thing to do for an analyst but we realised if we could automate the process, and do it well, we could produce incredibly powerful insights that anyone in the marketing team could pick up and run with. We spent about a year on the basics of that before we launched the company and since then we’ve been growing in Europe and Asia very fast and getting some amazing results.”

    Since opening a Singapore office last October, the company has signed up Philippine Seven Corporation – the local operator of the 7-Eleven convenience store network – adding the brand to an international list already including AirAsia, Tesco, Selfridges and Jelmoli.

    “We are new to the region, but we have been talking to businesses in Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore and the Philippines. Hong Kong is definitely one of our next steps and we are speaking to some great businesses there.”

    Big Data for Humans works within retail sectors ranging from convenience stores to luxury and in size from small businesses to multinationals. The concept is easily scaled to fit different sized companies.

    “The smallest retailer we deal with would have tens of thousands of customer records, whereas the largest might have 60 million.” Data sources the company starts with range from loyalty-scheme information, or data collected from e-commerce receipts. “You generally find a retailer has some degree of data coverage.”

    The business hosts workshops in Europe and Asia in a bid to ‘demystify’ big data, the most recent held in Kuala Lumpur in May. During the two-hour sessions, retailers are challenged to rank their needs for information using a ‘playbook’. The retailers rank goals in order of priority, such as upselling, cross-selling, retention and win-back. They then drill down into subcategories like (within retention) seasonality prediction, implementing a VIP program, improving the conversion from first to second order and enhancing customer sentiment during the purchase process. There is no hard-sell at these seminars – rather they help retailers understand where their business is at and how using their own data can make a difference.

    For example, Tesco used data to cross-sell customers making weekly shops for shelf-stable foods into more regular shoppers buying fresh foods where the margins are higher. “Obviously they were buying fresh food, they just weren’t buying it from Tesco,” explained Ian Webster, chief customer officer at the Kuala Lumpur workshop. Using big data to drive a tailored marketing campaign, Tesco converted 15 per cent of ‘family supplier” shoppers into fresh food shoppers.

    Train-of-thought

    “In analytics there is something called a train-of-thought analysis where you sit an analyst down in front of data and everyone says: well that’s amazing – but what are we going to do now?,” explains Ellen.

    “Often they come up with interesting things that nobody can use. So in our software and our playbook we take a highly prescriptive approach to how you turn the data results you have in your business into money. Because that’s really all we are interested in. We guide people down that path and our software looks at what is the most important data you need in retail – we believe that’s mainly around people, products and money. And then we guide them through that process so that the output tells them who the customers are, what they want, what they might want in the future, how much they are worth, how often they shop, where they shop and all the main things they need.

    “And then through our methodology we help them plan a customer marketing program across their business and channels that should deliver an increase in annual revenue.

    “Big data provides a massive competitive edge because now retailers can actually plan their customer marketing communications and strategy in their overall business rather than in one channel. A lot of marketing is done in channel now where the company says: ‘I might send them an email on a Monday, an SMS on a Tuesday and a flyer on a Wednesday’, whereas our solution enables our clients to see what the opportunities are within the retailer’s customer base and how they can sell more.”

    Once they’ve worked that out, explains Ellen, they can calculate which channels are the best to contact the customer groups. It might mean direct relationships in the luxury sector, or reaching out by emailing special offers in high-volume businesses.”

    After only a matter of months in Asia, Ellen and his team are already seeing differences compared with European retailers.

    “Because Asian retailers often have experience running multiple locations and brands across multiple [territories], a lot have developed large databases for cross-brand marketing activities.”

    Big data is clearly in retailers’ lives to stay – and Ellen argues there is a need to understand it and make the most of it if retailers are to build a competitive edge – and more importantly optimise their sales.

    “It comes down to the economics of how you’re going to get more revenue from your customers. Retail is all about selling more to the customers you have.”

    “Embrace data,” adds chief marketing officer for Asia, Helen Wasserman. “You have to embrace it.”

    And study your customer life cycles, adds Webster. “A retailer might have customers who shop every week, every month or every five years. Treating those customers the same is not a good idea. If someone buys from you every three years and you don’t see them for a month, that’s not an issue. But if you normally see a customer every week and you don’t see them for a month, you should be worried.”

  • QR-code payments could dominate mobile payments

    QR-code payments could dominate mobile payments

    QR-code payments have the potential to replace any other form of mobile payment according to new research.

    More than 1000 Chinese consumers and 60 decision-makers from global merchant companies were surveyed by mobile payments specialist Cancan and financial research company Kapronasia for the first global study covering the impact of Asian mobile POS payments worldwide.

    “Alipay and WeChat Pay, both based on QR code technology, are already dwarfing their Western counterparts tenfold with 750 million active users between them,” says Cancan MD Candice Koo.

    She says global merchants need to meet shoppers’ expectations regarding mobile payments. “Today that consumer is predominantly Chinese, but in year we could also be looking at Indians, Indonesians, Japanese and Koreans, who are already all following the Chinese trajectory.”

    “The rapid adoption of mobile payments by Chinese consumers domestically is well known, but not as much how they are using them abroad,” says Kapronasia director Zennon Kapron.

    The 2017 Mobile Payment Survey: Chinese Consumers Abroad investigates how mobile payments methods such as Alipay and WeChat Pay are shaping Chinese consumer expectations toward shopping outside of China. It also investigates global merchant preparation for this phenomenon.

    Key findings include:

    • Mainland Chinese consumers expect to spend more with mobile payments this year and next when travelling abroad, overriding the use of cash or credit cards
    • Nearly half of the consumers surveyed made between 10 and 30 per cent of their overseas shopping purchases with QR-code mobile payment methods; one-third paid for more than half their purchases in China with mobile
    • Fashion and cosmetics/skincare products are the categories most likely to attract mobile payment purchases
    • Consumers chose mobile payments for transaction convenience and the ability to track purchases in real time; they also appreciate not needing to carry cash and credit cards while travelling
    • More than a third of merchants who accept mobile payments say this payment method contributes to at least 3 per cent of their global sales, with some merchants experiencing a share as high as 25 per cent.

    The report says customer demand is driving merchant adoption of mobile payments, while merchants are attracted by the speed of mobile-payment transactions.

  • Inflight Wi-Fi essential for 2 in 3 APAC travelers

    Inflight Wi-Fi essential for 2 in 3 APAC travelers

    Two thirds of airline passengers in Asia-Pacific feel that inflight Wi-Fi is not merely a luxury but a necessity, according to Inmarsat-commissioned research.

    A survey of travelers in the region, conducted by market research company GfK, found that 79% are willing to pay for inflight connectivity even on short leisure flights. In addition, 61% believe quality inflight Wi-Fi is more important than onboard entertainment.

    The survey found that inflight broadband is changing the airline industry and transforming travelers’ expectations of the onboard experience.

    Inflight Wi-Fi is becoming so important that over half (52%) of passengers in the region say they will stop using their preferred airline within the next year if it does not introduce the technology.

    Passengers who have experienced high-quality in-flight Wi-Fi also rate it as the third most important consideration when choosing an airline, behind ticket price and flight slots.

    Passengers in China are more likely to be conscious of the quality of Wi-Fi (55%) than those from other countries in the region. Notably, the top three airlines that passengers expect to offer in-flight Wi-Fi and eventually lead the inflight connectivity market in APAC are airlines from China – Air China (46%), China Eastern Airlines (22%) and China Southern Airlines (21%).

    “Good quality Wi-Fi in the air is changing the way people think about flying. Whether using the time to work, to connect with friends and family, or to pass time shopping or viewing entertainment, the availability of inflight broadband has become a major factor when choosing an airline,” Inmarsat Aviation vice president for APAC Otto Gergye said.

    “It’s clear the opportunity that connectivity presents to airlines cannot be underestimated. Airlines in Asia Pacific are recognising this, and can now take advantage of having a high quality onboard Wi-Fi option available in the region.”

  • Blockchain: Revolution in supply chain?

    Blockchain: Revolution in supply chain?

    Supply chains revolutionized how our society runs, now supply chains are being revolutionized. The name of the NEW game: blockchain! Supply chains can lack transparency and traceability. Two things at which blockchain is great at.

    Systems work based on transactions. They are built on a distributed blockchain ledger can record the transfer of goods as transactions. This transparency can ensure the cost of goods will more accurately reflect the actual cost of manufacturing them. Issues such as use of forced labor and illegal sourcing of materials can potentially disappear. But despite the hype and its potential, it could take a decade or more before the technology achieves its full potential.

    We have a few interesting examples. Provenance, a UK-based startup, works with clients so they can use its blockchain-based technology to “share your product’s journey and your business impact on environment and society.” Mining giant BHP Billiton is using the technology to track mineral analysis done by outside vendors. The startup Everledger has uploaded unique identifying data on a million individual diamonds to a blockchain ledger system to build quality assurances and help jewelers comply with regulations barring “blood diamond” products.

    Walmart is working with IBM and Tsinghua University, in Beijing. They want to follow the movement of pork in China with a blockchain.

    Long term what we should have in mind:

    Potential to disrupt many industries
    There are parallels between this global-scale distributed technology and previous technology-driven transformative waves, such as the web and the internet. Early technology adoption of blockchain will progress over the next three to seven years, but mainstream adoption across the supply chain and at scale is likely 10 or more years away. Similar to RFID in its early days, business processes and standards must be resolved before blockchain can reach its potential.

    It is not a replacement for database tech
    Many believe, but they are wrong, that blockchain is a replacement for traditional database technologies — it lacks the ability to create, read, update and delete information. For the immediate future, traditional database management tools and platforms will continue to prevail in supply chain, where data is created, maintained and consumed largely internally. Database capabilities, however, will increasingly need to scale and integrate across a broader number of supply chain network partners and ultimately customers. There is where blockchain is best.

    You can’t just buy a solution!
    There is no blockchain solutions to buy for supply chain use at the moment. There continues to be a lot of hype, with few even partially deployed and very limited prototypes, for which firmer results or tangible uses cases are still be reported. Only organizations that are especially risk-tolerant and early adopters of technologies should consider supply chain management blockchain initiatives over the next two to five years.

    Stormy waters ahead
    There are more challenges than we can mention here. Blockchain technologies and associated supply chain best practices bring adoption challenges, including a lack of standards, robust platforms, scalable distributed consensus systems and interoperability mechanisms.Scalability across supply chains will need to be carefully planned.

    Laws and regulations — which vary from country to country — also pose a challenge to global scaling of blockchain. Before governments can be convinced to support this effort, industry must agree on best practices and standards of technology.

    Adoption too late or too early as part of an extended supply chain and supply chain maturity progression may do damage to the entire organisation.

    Also there’s the need to overcome embedded corporate thinking. Business leaders and organizations need to open up to the sharing of information with mainly unseen network partners.

    In conclusion
    Blockchain is presently at the peak of Gartner’s Hype Cycle, which means the next stop is the Trough of Disillusionment. In supply chain circles the technology is suddenly drawing serious interest, in part because of IBM’s recent push to go public with pilots including one with Maersk and another with Walmart.

    As RFID promised to do, blockchain could one day provide certainty on the exact source of every ingredient in every jar, in every case, on every shelf and at all times. Was your palm oil sustainably sourced? Are the cherries in your ice cream organic? Are the avocados in your salad imported from Mexico? Also reminiscent of RFID, however, is a decent amount of uncertainty about the timing of the business case.

    Envisioning a digitally enabled supply chain strategy is a must-do activity for everyone. Fitting blockchain into that strategy now means listening more than talking. Listen to your colleagues in corporate IT who are likely ahead of you since they’ve often faced this topic already with financial transactions. Also, listen also to vendors like IBM who are invested in establishing a market for this technology and can afford to find and foster pioneering users like Walmart and Maersk.

    Blockchain may still be down the road, but its potential demands your attention now.

  • The economics of the money-back guarantee

    The economics of the money-back guarantee

    “Returning the product to Amazon ASAP!” complained one disgruntled Amazon customer as they gave a one-star review for a digital camera on the company’s site. This is despite the same product having an average rating of four-and-a-half stars out of five from 242 other customers.

    Companies like Amazon aren’t just ignoring these disgruntled customers and their product-returning ways. In fact, retailers are increasingly offering extra services such as warranty plans, free shipping and guarantees to reassure them. Selling with the “money-back guarantee” is a prime example of this.

    This is because the economics of the money-back guarantee can work for retailers. These businesses allow customers to return products that do not meet their expectations — as a result of poor quality or a mismatch in taste — for a full or partial refund. Essentially offering their customers an insurance against the perceived risk of the product.

    And research shows these retailers make a profit with this type of guarantee, given specific conditions. Other research also shows the money-back guarantee increases customers’ feeling of satisfaction with their purchase experience, making them likely to return to the store.

    This type of guarantee is particularly important for retailers who sell products online or through mail-order catalogues. This is because customers can’t enjoy the benefits of the traditional “touch-and-feel” shopping experience, to reassure them they are making the right decision.

    Customers rorting the scheme

    Customer returns cost retailers more than US$260 billion (equivalent to 8 per cent of total retail sales) annually in the United States alone. The return rates vary significantly by category, and by channel type. It can reach as high as 35 per cent for high fashion apparel sold in traditional stores, and the rates are higher again for internet and catalogue sales.

    However, in most cases, the returned products are not defective. Customers abuse the money-back guarantee, so much so that buying a product with the intention of returning it has become a trend known as wardrobing or barrowing. In the US, fraud associated with returns costs retailers around US$2 billion during the holiday season alone (US$9 billion annually).

    Retailers try to get around this by offering partial instead of full money-back guarantees for products. The refund is usually less a “restocking fee” charged for returns.

    For example, compare the 30 day money-back guarantees from two Australian furniture retailers, Zanui and Rogerseller. Zanui offers a full refund, whereas Rogerseller charges its customers a 15 per cent restocking fee (it pays back only 85 per cent of the selling price rather than the full amount).

    In most cases, restocking fees can range between 10% and 20% of the original purchase price, some even as high as 50 per cent.

    A survey by professional services company Accenture reported that in the computer electronics industry, most customers returned their products because they simply “did not meet expectations.” More specifically, for 68 per cent of returns, there was “no trouble found” by the customers; 27 per cent of the products were returned due to “buyer’s remorse”.

    And only 5 per cent of the products returned were truly defective. However, regardless of the reason, returned products cannot be sold as “new,” even though the product could be new in the sense that it was never used.

    Major consumer electronics retailers such as Best Buy and Walmart restock these returned items and sell them as “open-box items” at discounted prices. Open-box simply means the product is marked as being opened or used previously. A retailer’s ability to sell returned products as open-box creates an opportunity to attract more price conscious consumers.

    The downside of such product differentiation is that open-box products can have a negative impact on the demand for the new products in a store. The retailer might also have to incur additional costs for handling returns and repackaging them as open-box.

    Making or losing money on the money-back guarantee

    Balancing the benefits and costs of the money-back guarantee is a delicate task for retailers. In studying the guarantee we worked out how retailers could use it to increase sales and profits.

    We looked at product pricing, refunding and inventory stocking decisions in money-back guaranteed sales. We took into account uncertainty in demand, the possibility of a customer’s dissatisfaction with the product after purchase, as well as the lower value customers place on an open-box product, relative to brand new products.

    Using this model, we figured out the best prices retailers could use reselling returned products and the restocking fees to encourage or discourage returns, for the highest possible net profit.

    Even though reselling returned products meant less stock for the retailer it also reduced inventory-related costs adding to profits. In essence, retailers can claim back at least some of the costs associated with return fraud, with reselling.

    In areas of retail with higher risk of returns, the temptation is to tighten returns policies, to limit them. This is especially true for highly innovative products, new technologies, or fashion-driven products (especially high-end ones).

    Interestingly, our study shows that reselling returns complements the money-back guarantee. So these type of high-risk products are likely to give retailers the most benefit, when they are resold after being returned.

    Retailers also feel the benefit of reselling when there are more price conscious customers who are more inclined to buy a product that is being resold, because it’s at a discount.

    So the economics of the money-back guarantee can work for retailers by improving brand value and through reselling via open-box products

  • The State Of The Aging Craft Beer Industry

    The State Of The Aging Craft Beer Industry

    The craft beer industry may still have some few more good years left in it, but its old has started showing after years of enjoy double-digit growth over the past years. Single-digit growth only happened last year and with it come the concern that the industry is set for a poor performance.

    While several factors played a hand in the slowdown, it is most likely that the craft beer industry from here on will be on a downhill journey.

    The Industry Is Aging Well

    As of 2016, the Brewers Association said the growth of the craft beer industry slowed shy of 6%, which was a seven digit drop from that of 2015 and a twelve digits from that of 2014. Well, nothing good lasts forever; likewise, no business can register a torrid growth forever. But it can be said that the craft beer industry did last longer than expected and its reached full maturity. Now focus is on what the future hold for the industry’s producers.

    From the chart above, it’s clear that the industry as seen the last of its good days and it most likely is a victim of its success.

    Boston Beer may not be the first in the craft beer industry but it rapidly became the face of craft beer product. Its success was the start of many other home brewers making their leap in the big-league. The Samuel Adams brands also contributed to the cultural changes that lead to changing how a beer tasted a transition for the weal amber-color beer that were in mass production done by Miller, Molson Coors, and Anheuser-Busch InBev to the dark and richer-tasting brew.

    Bound To Be Bigger Than Ever

    With more than 5,300 breweries in operation, that is an outstanding number that the country has seen it is history. And of these, 99% are in the craft brewing industry. That is a significant figure, a huge leap from that of less than 2,000 breweries in 2011. Based on that information, the breweries growth stands at around 21% annually. Is the craft beer industry running its last leg?

    Boston Beer attribute to its depleted sales to wholesalers and retailers over the last twelve months to the increased demand for shelf space. The wholesalers and retailers are considered as the bridge between the producers and the consumers.

    The growth of the craft breweries caught the attention of mega-brewers but their sales soon took a similar direction, flat-lining and taking a decline soon after. To answer the poor turn of events, Molson launched Blue Moon and Anheuser-Busch followed suit with Shock Top; nevertheless, the domestic beer sales never improved. So, they began purchasing the smaller players in the industry and Anheuser-Busch bagging much of the competitions. Other big players that made significant investments in the craft brewery industry include Constellation, Heineken, and Molson Brands (NYSE:STZ).

    The decline seen in the brewing of craft beers may be attributed to the turn of events stated above. Nearly 1.2 million barrels have been taken out via the acquisitions must of which was from regionals with much of this coming from micro-breweries and brewpubs. As such, the Brewers Associated noted, based on that data, that the craft is bound to get even smaller. This craft beer industry report has an even more in-depth look into this.

    Continuing To Take Market Share

    According to the trade group, a craft brewery qualifies to be considered as such if it produces around six million barrels annually and with a control or ownership by a mass brewer that is below 25% and mostly uses traditional brewing ingredients and methods. Ballast Point Brewing was a known craft brewer; it was bought by Constellation Brands, an acquisition that saw it pulled out of the group. The same fate befall all the other craft beer makers that were acquired by Anheuser-Busch over the past years.

    The remaining breweries, as of 2016, account for the 1.4 million barrels recorded during the same year which was higher than the volume of barrels taken out and a sign of a better things still to come for the industry. Nevertheless, the many craft brewers still in play contributed to an increased competition for the limited shelf space.

    A Shakeout In The Works?

    The craft beer industry is most likely going to consider some reductions and making alliances over the next years. 97 breweries close in 2016, 29 more than what was seen in 2015 and 51 the year before that. The numbers may seem alarming but the market still has many old players and new ones who keep coming in; thus the increased competition only promises to make it harder for brewers to operate profitably.

    Ultimately, the industry will have to consider a craft beer shakeout which may help keep the breweries that are in the pink operational even as the few local favorites fade off.

  • Korean online shopping growth surge as retail sales stumble

    Korean online shopping growth surge as retail sales stumble

    Online shopping is experiencing a growth surge, accounting for close to 20 percent of all retail sales in the first quarter of this year.

    Retail transactions in the three months to March totaled 96.56 trillion won (US$85.83 billion), a growth of 4.7 percent from the same period a year before, according to Statistics Korea. The sum of online shopping was 18.21 trillion won, or 19 percent of the total.

    This represents a 19.6 percent leap from the same quarter of the previous year and the largest total since related record keeping began in 2010.

    The ratio of online sales to all retail sales has grown in double digits every quarter since the fourth quarter of 2012, when it was 10.2 percent. It reached 17.7 percent in the last quarter of 2016.

    In monetary terms, the amount of transactions has also expanded by double digits, increasing the growth pace from 11.2 percent in the first quarter of 2013 to 23.2 percent in the third quarter of 2016. It fell to 19.6 percent in the first three months of this year.

    The mobile sector played a critical part in contributing to online shopping, accounting for 59 percent of the sales in March.
    “Mobile shopping has grown with the wide penetration of smartphones, and shopping malls have also been pushing their mobile platforms,” a Statistics Korea official said.

    Such high performance of online sectors contrasts with sluggish figures in the overall retail market. Retail sales gains that reached over 10 percent in the first two quarters of 2011 shrank to 0.6 percent by the second quarter of 2013. They bounced back somewhat to 3-5 percent last year.

    Sales at department store, the strongest source of offline shopping, have backtracked. The monetary amount of transactions fell 1.5 percent in January from a year before, 5.6 percent in February and 3.5 percent in March. The figures showed a decrease of 2.2 percent in April and 4.6 percent in May.

  • New Zeeland among world’s technology elite

    New Zeeland among world’s technology elite

    New Zealand is among the world’s stand out digital economies, according to the Digital Evolution Index 2017 launched yesterday by The Fletcher School at Tufts University and Mastercard.

    The research tracks the progress countries have made in developing their digital economies and integrating connectivity into the lives of billions – and put New Zealand with a group of digital elites – characterised by high levels of digital development and a fast rate of digital evolution.

    “We all know technology can do more to improve economies and make our lives better, but growth is only achievable if everyone has confidence in the developing ecosystem,” said Ajay Bhalla, president, global enterprise risk & security, Mastercard. “In our pursuit of a truly connected world, trust and security are critical to successful digital development.”

    With nearly half of the world’s population online, the research examined the development of 60 countries, demonstrating their competitiveness and market potential for further digital economic growth. The Index measures four key drivers and 170 unique indicators to chart each country’s respective course:

    •         Supply (or internet access and infrastructure)
    •         Consumer demand for digital technologies
    •         Institutional environment (government policies/laws and resources)
    •         Innovation (investments into R&D and digital start-ups etc.)

    “Adoption, the quality of digital infrastructure and institutions, and innovation collectively shape a country’s digital competitiveness, but governments also play a key role,” said Bhaskar Chakravorti, senior associate dean of international business & finance at The Fletcher School at Tufts University. “The report also found that consumers’ trust in digital technologies correlates with digital competitiveness.”

    According to their overall digital evolution scores, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, Denmark, Finland, Singapore, South Korea, the United Kingdom, Hong Kong, and the United States make the top ten list of advanced digital economies.

    The research found developed countries including in Western Europe, the Nordics, Australia and South Korea have a history of strong growth, but their momentum is slowing and are at risk of falling behind. Countries such as South Africa, Peru, Egypt, Greece and Pakistan face significant challenges, constrained both by low levels of digital advancement and a slow pace of growth.

  • Things to know about Bitcoin

    Things to know about Bitcoin

    Bitcoin is the world’s most widely used crypto currency. Mark Karpeles, the former CEO of collapsed Bitcoin exchange MtGox, went on trial in Tokyo on charges stemming from the disappearance of hundreds of millions of dollars worth of the virtual currency from its digital vaults.

    Here are some key facts about the world’s most widely used crypto currency:

    What is Bitcoin?

    Bitcoin is a virtual currency created from computer code. Unlike a real-world unit such as the US dollar or euro, it has no central bank and is not backed by any government.

    Instead, Bitcoin’s community of users control and regulate it. Advocates say this makes it an efficient alternative to traditional currencies because it is not subject to the whims of a state that may devalue its money to boost exports, for example.

    Just like other currencies, Bitcoins can be exchanged for goods and services — or for other currencies — provided the other party is willing to accept them.

    Where does it come from?

    Bitcoin was launched in 2009 as a bit of encrypted software written by someone using the Japanese-sounding name Satoshi Nakamoto.

    Last year secretive Australian entrepreneur Craig Wright said he was the creator of Bitcoin, but some have raised doubts over his claim.

    Hundreds of other digital currencies followed but Bitcoin is by far the most popular, with an increasing number of merchants accepting digital currencies for payments.

    Transactions happen when heavily encrypted codes are passed across a computer network. The network as a whole monitors and verifies the transaction in a process that is intended to ensure no single Bitcoin can be spent in more than one place simultaneously.

    Users can “mine” Bitcoins — bring new ones into being — by having their computers run complicated and increasingly difficult processes.

    However, the model is limited and only 21 million units will ever be created.

    What’s it worth?

    Like any other currency, it fluctuates. But unlike most real-world units, Bitcoin’s value has swung wildly in a short period.

    When it first came into existence it was worth a few US cents. Several years later Bitcoin topped $1,000. It’s now worth more than $2,300, with commentators suggesting some are buying it as an alternative bet in times of global economic uncertainty.

    The chaotic withdrawal of high-value notes in India, and Chinese controls on the purchase of foreign currency have also been cited for its meteoric rise.

    There are presently more than 16 million units in circulation. Some economists say the limited number of Bitcoins mean its price will increase over the long run, making it less useful as a currency and more a vehicle to store value, like gold.

    But detractors point to Bitcoin’s volatility, security issues and other weaknesses as flaws that will eventually undermine it.

    What’s the future?

    Some commentators say that like many technological developments, the first iteration of a product will encounter difficulties, possibly terminal ones. But the trail it blazes might smooth the way for the next crypto currency.

    Problems include an apparent vulnerability to theft when Bitcoins are stored in digital wallets.

    A major Hong Kong-based Bitcoin exchange suspended trading last year after $65 million in the virtual unit was reportedly stolen by hackers.

    The virtual currency movement also faces legitimacy issues because of the way it allows for anonymous transactions — the very thing that libertarian adopters like about it.

    Detractors say bitcoin’s use on the underground Silk Road website, where users could buy drugs and guns with it, is proof that it is a bad thing.

    If Bitcoin does become more widely accepted, experts say, it could lead to more government regulations, which would negate the very attraction of the concept.

  • e-retail brands out of the social media loop in SE Asia

    e-retail brands out of the social media loop in SE Asia

    Over 85% of consumers in Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia, who mention e-retailer brand names in their social media posts don’t tag brand handles, according to Digimind.

    This means brands need to be vigilant in monitoring their brand reputation in the wider social media space to ensure they aren’t missing out on key conversations and trends, and are able to act upon any customer service concerns quickly.

    With the rise of empowered consumers and an increasing adoption of online shopping, e-retailers need to adopt customer-centric strategies in order to thrive. With so much of our daily conversations happening online, data from social media can provide key insights for e-retailers wishing to optimize customer experiences.

    Digimind’s study, Social Shopping in 2017, assessed the state of the e-retail industry in the three countries by monitoring 15 local and regional e-retailers, including Lazada, Zalora, and Berrybenka.

    “It’s no secret that brands who implement customer-centric strategies are excelling. With 2.8 billion active social media users in Southeast Asia, it is crucial for e-retailers to listen to what is being said about their brand, competitors and the industry online,” said Stephen Dale, general manager of APAC at Digimind.

    “Understanding what consumers are saying on social media can provide companies with an arsenal of insights that can be used to develop content strategies, improve customer service, build brand advocacy, and increase sales,” said Dale.

    He added that when analyzed in conjunction with other data such as web page visits and browsing behavior, this can further inform marketing plans and Voice of the Customer programs.

    The study also revealed that while the majority of e-retailer’s followers in the countries studied were on Facebook, consumers were most actively publicly posting their opinions and experiences on e-retailers on Instagram and Twitter.

    This means while Facebook is the ideal channel for brands to communicate with followers, Instagram and Twitter are key channels for community engagement.

  • New Mobile Solution Boosts Millennial Performance at Work

    New Mobile Solution Boosts Millennial Performance at Work

    Manhattan Associates today announced the release of Performance at Work, a new solution for enhancing employee engagement, which results in productivity gains, lower attrition rates, and therefore greater customer satisfaction. The solution drives improved employee satisfaction by aligning individual employee activities with established organisational goals and metrics, providing employees and managers frequent feedback on their performance via their mobile devices.

    According to several Gallop Research polls, the majority of workers across the globe are simply not engaged at work. Gallop’s 2017 survey of American workers reveals that 70 percent of US employees are not engaged, whilst its global report from a few years prior indicates that 87 percent of workers in Southeast Asia are not engaged. And the challenge is even more acute with the rapidly growing millennial workforce. The research firm reports that millennials change jobs at three times the rate of other generations.

    Gallup’s most recent report reveals potential solutions to the millennial engagement challenge. Millennial workers require more frequent and consistent performance feedback. They also prefer to connect and interact with the world through their own mobile devices.

    The new Performance at Work solution enhances communications with a modern and connected workforce. It leverages the latest mobile technologies to provide millennial workers with the frequent performance feedback they require. The solution combines a challenge-based approach to learning with continual performance data on mobile devices. Performance at Work is designed to boost employee engagement and encourage the development of highly positive relationships between warehouse employees and their supervisors.

    “Productivity improvements often focus on high-performing execution applications, like warehouse and labour management, yet support for the human element of the equation has largely been overlooked,” said Peter Schnorbach, senior director, Product Strategy, Manhattan Associates. “Companies will have to shift this focus as more millennials, and their need for frequent feedback, enter the workforce. Performance at Work is designed to engage this modern, more connected worker through their preferred medium – the smartphone.”

    Manhattan today introduced the following Performance at Work solutions:

    • The new Employee Engagement mobile application delivers a weekly performance scorecard directly to employees’ smartphones. The software leverages gamification concepts to engage, motivate and incentivise success. It provides regular feedback on how each employee impacts company success and how their work ranks against that of their colleagues.
    • Manhattan recently embedded Labour Management (LM) functionality within the traditional Warehouse Management System (WMS) to deliver immediate labour reporting and improved visibility into employee productivity. By integrating the typically separate components of LM and WMS, Manhattan’s Performance at Work also reduces deployment time and drives immediate ROI.
  • Vietnam beats Thailand, Indonesia with big jump in global innovation ranking

    Vietnam beats Thailand, Indonesia with big jump in global innovation ranking

    The country, at number 47, is now only behind Singapore and Malaysia in Southeast Asia. Vietnam has been named the 47th most innovative economy in the world, its best performance to date, according to this year’s Global Innovation Index report.

    The country jumped 12 spots compared to last year, thanks to its efforts to improve business environment as well as competitiveness.

    Vietnam also ranked first among lower-middle income economies. Among Southeast Asian countries, it overtook Thailand to secure the third place, only behind Singapore and Malaysia.

    Global Innovation Index of Southeast Asian economiesSingapore (7th)Malaysia (37th)Vietnam (47th)Thailand (51st)Brunei (71st)Philippines (73rd)Indonesia (87th)Cambodia (101st)010203040506070Source: Global Innovation Index (GII)

    Knowledge and Technology Outputs, one of the main pillars of the index, was found to be Vietnam’s strong point.

    The country also performed well in Market Sophistication and in Creative Outputs. However, Vietnam’s performance was mediocre in the other pillars that measure institutional framework, human capital, infrastructures and business sophistication.

    “New Asian Tigers — such as Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam — are emerging too, and they increasingly join not only Asian high-tech value chains but also other activities such as ICT offshoring. These and other countries in Asia are also active in improving their innovation performance,” the report said.

    The report, co-published by the World Intellectual Property Organization, Cornell University and the business school INSEAD, surveys the innovation performance of 127 economies around the world.

    Vietnam has been part of the index since its debut in 2007. The country has been climbing up since 2013, after several years of hovering just above the 70th place.

  • Brick-and-mortar stores with online presence have retail edge

    Brick-and-mortar stores with online presence have retail edge

    The growth of e-commerce may pose a serious threat to brick-and-mortar stores, but there is a silver lining for department stores here. A nationwide survey has found that department stores with both a physical and online presence can have a competitive edge over online-only stores.

    Department store customers who shopped via the store’s online channels – such as its website or mobile app – reported higher levels of customer loyalty than shoppers at e-commerce sites such as Zalora and Groupon.

    This was one of the findings of the latest Customer Satisfaction Index of Singapore released yesterday.

    “This would suggest that traditional brick-and-mortar stores could be better served and complemented by developing a robust omni-channel presence if they have not already done so. It can potentially give them a competitive edge over the e-commerce retailers,” said Mr Chen Yongchang, head of research and consulting at the Institute of Service Excellence (ISE) at the Singapore Management University, which compiled the index.

    The survey of 6,900 Singapore residents and tourists between January and April this year found that satisfaction levels in the retail sector remained similar to last year’s, with the retail sector scoring 72.1 points out of 100, up from 71.7 the year before.

    Of the four retail sub-sectors surveyed, the department store sub-sector showed significant improvement.

    This largely stemmed from more satisfied local shoppers, said Ms Neeta Lachmandas, ISE’s executive director.

    “This increase could be related to the revamps of various stores and product offerings, as well as increased promotional activities targeted at boosting sales.”

    Among department stores, DFS had the highest score of 73.6 while Metro was the only store whose score had increased significantly.

    DFS’ managing director for Singapore and Indonesia, Ms Wilcy Wong, attributed the retailer’s high score to its focus on providing “authentic and personal customer engagement. But at the heart of the DFS experience is of course our people,” she added.

    “We invest heavily in talent management programmes, as well as learning and development through our own DFS University to enhance our operations.”

    The fashion apparel, supermarket and e-commerce sub-sectors did not see any significant change in scores.

    A notable observation among supermarket customers was that those who frequently used self-checkout counters were more satisfied than those who mostly used manned cashier counters.

    The survey also looked at customer satisfaction for the info-communications sector, which scored a record high of 69.6 points out of 100, up 1.6 per cent.

    ISE found that service attributes relating to responsiveness, assurance and empathy were key drivers of loyalty among mobile telecommunications and broadband customers.

    This was in addition to the usual product-related attributes such as suitable subscription plans and fast data speeds.

  • The Challenges For Global Retail Franchises in Indonesia

    The Challenges For Global Retail Franchises in Indonesia

    Research company Spire in 2016 found Indonesia is viewed as the region’s largest franchise industry, with experts predicting at least 60 percent of franchise business operated in Indonesia last year with the majority of foreign franchises.

    Amir Karamoy, Chairman of the National Committee for Franchising and Licenses at the Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, said regional headquarters based in Indonesia should be encouraged as it benefits the country through taxes and human resource development. But at this stage, Indonesia’s complicated regulations regarding retail businesses and franchises limit foreign involvement, particularly for foreign businesses hoping to base a regional headquarters in the country.

    These regulations, as well as strong competition, can spell trouble for even the biggest global brands. The recent announcement that US convenience store giant 7-Eleven will close its doors in Indonesia has prompted speculation on further reforms.

    Modern Sevel Indonesia (MSI), the local arm of 7-Eleven Indonesia, opened its first store in Bulungan, South Jakarta, in 2009.

    “The business model that 7-Eleven implemented made underlying products such as snacks, beverages and cigarettes popular. This had made several other mini markets struggle to compete,” University of Indonesia academic and businessman Rhenald Kasali said.

    The chain introduced the hang-out concept to Indonesia, which saw young people gather to spend time together and snack, which in turn disrupt traditional models where customers would purchase food and then leave.

    Kasali speculated the Indonesian government does not support the business concept, which could have been a factor in MSI closing all stores by the end of June.

    He said government regulations typically ‘take sides’ in support of older retailers.

    “Sixty percent of 7-Eleven’s income came from youngsters who hang out at the store. 7-Eleven suffered because of bureaucracy and regulators that don’t understand the business model,” Kasali added.

    7-Eleven faced tough questioning from the Ministry of Trade when it first launched about the concept and whether the outlets were convenience stores or restaurants. A government regulation which prohibited the sale of alcohol at convenience stores is also believed to be a factor in the shutdown.

    The convenience store brand is not the first international giant to struggling to do business in Indonesia. Last year Swedish furniture retailer IKEA struggled to keep its franchise in Indonesia due to copyright problems with a firm called IKEA Surabaya.

    The Surabaya-based IKEA had registered the name in 2013, while the Swedish firm had registered in 2013. But Indonesian regulators defended the Surabaya business, saying the Swedish IKEA had been commercially inactive. As a result, Swedish IKEA paid a royalty to the Surabaya IKEA.

    Similarly, French fashion brand Pierre Cardin sued Jakarta businessman Alexander Satyo Wibowo who had been using the name for his brand in Indonesia. Like the IKEA case, the courts sided with the local business and ruled Pierre Cardin had lost the rights to the name due to inactivity.

    Although Pierre Cardin is a famous brand globally, the company registered its name in Indonesia in 2009 while Wibowo registered his brand in 1977. As a result, France’s Pierre Cardin no longer open outlets in Indonesia under that name.