Retail News CRM

Tag: stocks

  • Singapore stocks end down 1.57 pct

    Singapore stocks end down 1.57 pct

    Singapore shares closed 1.57 percent lower on Wednesday, as investors were catching up with the fall in the U.S. stock market earlier this week amid a global sell-off.

    Trading resumed on Wednesday after the Lunar New Year break. Investors looked to U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen’s congressional testimony later on Wednesday for fresh cues on the policy outlook, which may provide some relief for markets.

    While Yellen is expected to defend the Federal Reserve’s first rate hike in a decade last year and likely insist that further increases remain on track, any signs of a departure from such a stance in the wake of global growth concerns could provide risk assets such as equities with a breather.

    Singapore’s benchmark Straits Times Index fell 41.11 points to 2,582.10 points. Trading volume was 802 million shares worth 1.2 billion Singapore dollars. Decliners outnumbered advancers 288 to 85, while 550 stocks did not move.

    United Engineers Limited fell 1.5 percent to 1.94 Singapore dollars. The engineering and property group said it was looking to dispose its indirectly-owned unit MultiFineline Electronix.

    The buyer is Shenzhen-listed stamping and sheet metal manufacturer, Suzhou Dongshan Precision Manufacturing. United Engineers will expect to realize an attributable net disposal gain of about 115.2 million Singapore dollars, and receive net proceeds of about 505.3 million Singapore dollars.

    Zhongmin Baihui Retail Group dived 25.7 percent to 1.30 Singapore dollars. The Singapore Exchange said it was reviewing trading in the counter, noting that a “small group of individuals” was responsible for more than 90 percent of the buy volume of the Chinese department store operator’s shares in the year to February 4 and that these individuals appear to be connected to one another. The bourse operator last Friday urged investors to exercise caution on trading shares of Zhongmin Baihui.

    Among the top gainers, Jardine Matheson rose 0.6 percent to 54.02 U.S. dollars, whereas UOB became one of the top losers by falling 1.7 percent to 17.56 Singapore dollars. (1 U.S. dollar equals to 1.39 Singapore dollars)

  • How South Korea is hurting European shares

    How South Korea is hurting European shares

    Seoul hosts largest and most liquid market in the world for options on single stocks. What links a European benchmark equity index, the Hong Kong dollar and a group of blue-chip Chinese stocks? Apart from the early-year pain shared by investors in all three, Seoul may not be the first answer that springs to mind. But it appears South Korea’s outsized derivatives market, dominated by retail investors, has a lot to answer for.

    Korea hosts the largest and most liquid market in the world for options on single stocks — bigger than the US, even, according to bankers — and retail interest in derivatives does not stop there. In what looks like the latest example of a “butterfly effect” in global markets, last year Korean investors bought record amounts of so-called “autocallables” — a structured product offering an attractive yield. About $40bn are outstanding.

    Markets Insight

    This year stock market losses have forced the sellers of those deals to hedge their exposure — that has damped volatility for Euro Stoxx-linked products, pressured the tightly-pegged Hong Kong dollar and crushed the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index. On Wednesday for example, the sliding oil price prompted a weakening of stocks across Asia. While in mainland China benchmark indices closed 0.4 per cent lower, the HSCEI — consisting of many of the same stocks — dropped 2.5 per cent.

    Autocallables contain features that have blown up previous products, from “target redemption forwards” — once dubbed kill-you-later-accumulators — to “knock-in-knock-out”, or Kiko, deals. Asian investors have reason to know: the former blew a $2bn hole in the balance sheet of Citic, China’s foremost conglomerate in 2008. And Kikos caused such problems for Korean companies that had wrongly hedged the South Korean won that regulators in 2009 had to stress test banks to gauge the depth of the issue.

    Since these autocallables are two- or three-year deals, and most were sold last year, the final reckoning over who has lost what is some way off. The area of interest for now is their effect on other markets.

    The products in essence sell volatility. They work by offering investors a “worst of” basket of two or three reference securities — typically indices. The sales pitch is that investors get a yield on top of their capital if the reference securities stay within a specified range. If they rally above it, investors are “knocked out” and get their money back with a bonus. If it falls below a specified point — usually between 40 and 50 per cent of the level, when the product was sold — they are “knocked in” and lose some capital.

    Holders can be made whole if the index recovers all lost ground before the autocallable ends — hence it being difficult to gauge losses at this point. However, the nearer an index falls to that strike price, the more product sellers have to hedge, which they do via selling futures. This is what is weighing on the HSCEI, which was a popular inclusion in the first half of last year because of China’s soaring markets. But it is now down 46 per cent from its May 2015 peak — putting it right in the zone where issuer hedging will be at its highest.

    Hong Kong indices are even more popular in Korean products because of the 32-year unchanged link between the Hong Kong dollar and its US counterpart. So imagine the fear among Korean sellers of autocallables last month on seeing the Hong Kong currency suddenly spike higher after Chinese authorities quashed speculative shorts in the offshore renminbi market. The result was additional weakening pressure on the Hong Kong dollar as Korean groups rushed to hedge.

    “The bottom line remains that investors should be aware of this additional market dynamic that could drive Hong Kong dollar volatility, forwards and swaps higher,” says William Chan, head of Asia-Pacific equity derivatives research at Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

    Before the financial crisis, most autocallables would have referenced South Korea’s benchmark Kospi Composite. But as the autocallables market grew and volatility in Korea stayed low, issuers had to look elsewhere. The Euro Stoxx 600 is down about 20 per cent from last year’s peak. In the current febrile environment, that could be enough to see Korean issuers wanting to hedge early — reportedly suppressing volatility in two- and three-year options.

    Korea’s derivatives habit does not yet look big enough to cause systemic stresses. But as an example of the unexpected and little-explored links between markets, it should be watched closely.

  • Vipshop Stock Slumping as China Trading Halted

    Vipshop Stock Slumping as China Trading Halted

    Shares of Vipshop Holdings are lower by 7.99% to $14.05 on Monday morning, as stocks traded in the U.S. but based in China tumble due to the global stock selloff, spurred by concerns regarding the Asian nation’s economic stability.

    Vipshop is a Guangzhou-based holding company that operates as an online discount retailer for brands in China.

    Weak manufacturing data in China sent the country’s markets plummeting, with the Shanghai index falling by 6.9% and the Shenzhen down by more than 8% before trading was halted on Monday.

    Contributing to the decline in China’s market is a lower than expected Caixin survey, which was released earlier today, CNBC.com reports. The Caixin index is a gauge of nationwide manufacturing activity, with a focus on small and medium sized companies.

    The Caixin December manufacturing PMI was lower at 48.2 versus 48.6 in November.

    Recently, TheStreet Ratings objectively rated this stock according to its “risk-adjusted” total return prospect over a 12-month investment horizon. Not based on the news in any given day, the rating may differ from Jim Cramer’s view or that of this articles’s author. TheStreet Ratings has this to say about the recommendation:

    We rate VIPSHOP HOLDINGS LTD -ADR as a Buy with a ratings score of B-. This is driven by some important positives, which we believe should have a greater impact than any weaknesses, and should give investors a better performance opportunity than most stocks we cover. The company’s strengths can be seen in multiple areas, such as its robust revenue growth, notable return on equity, reasonable valuation levels, impressive record of earnings per share growth and compelling growth in net income. We feel its strengths outweigh the fact that the company has had generally high debt management risk by most measures that we evaluated.

    Highlights from the analysis by TheStreet Ratings Team goes as follows:

    • VIPS’s very impressive revenue growth exceeded the industry average of 38.0%. Since the same quarter one year prior, revenues leaped by 54.6%. This growth in revenue appears to have trickled down to the company’s bottom line, improving the earnings per share.
    • VIPSHOP HOLDINGS LTD -ADR reported significant earnings per share improvement in the most recent quarter compared to the same quarter a year ago. The company has demonstrated a pattern of positive earnings per share growth over the past two years. We feel that this trend should continue. During the past fiscal year, VIPSHOP HOLDINGS LTD -ADR increased its bottom line by earning $0.23 versus $0.09 in the prior year. This year, the market expects an improvement in earnings ($3.48 versus $0.23).
    • Current return on equity exceeded its ROE from the same quarter one year prior. This is a clear sign of strength within the company. Compared to other companies in the Internet & Catalog Retail industry and the overall market, VIPSHOP HOLDINGS LTD -ADR’s return on equity significantly exceeds that of both the industry average and the S&P 500.
    • The company, on the basis of net income growth from the same quarter one year ago, has significantly underperformed compared to the Internet & Catalog Retail industry average, but is greater than that of the S&P 500. The net income increased by 79.9% when compared to the same quarter one year prior, rising from $27.70 million to $49.83 million.